|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:38 PM Original message |
Hillary Clinton to accept! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. I hope it's true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DangerousRhythm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
25. Me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
35. Me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Secret_Society (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
56. Me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. Saw that. Hope it's true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
3. Wow, the media have offered Hillary a job, vetted her and Bill, and announced her acceptance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:43 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Apparently some here think they're his transition team |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. What evidence do you have that people here believe they're his transition team? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:46 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. what evidence do you have media have offered Hillary a job, vetted her and Bill, and announced? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:47 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Your post. Or are you oblivious to the content of the articles you post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:49 PM Original message |
my post said nothing of the sort, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
21. Really? Obama specifically said not to believe stories about appointments unless they came from him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:51 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. what evidence do you have anyone believes the story? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:49 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Can you confirm that the Obama campaign offered Hillary SoS? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. nope! But then again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:52 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Don't worry about me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:56 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. No worries at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BumRushDaShow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:43 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. And in this case, it was the UK media too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
casus belli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:19 PM Response to Reply #3 |
38. The UK media no less. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElizabethDC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:37 PM Response to Reply #3 |
50. Haha - too true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
4. Funny, Obama specifically said not to believe anything unless it came from him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
6. Is this being reported by any American News Org? Brits have been wrong time and time again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:57 PM Response to Reply #6 |
67. The Guardian remains a relied upon channel for official leaks for reasons that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
8. Why isn't this in LBN? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BumRushDaShow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:46 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. It is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:49 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Not anymore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BumRushDaShow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. I had seen it on the front page too before they moved it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:55 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Is this more Clinton hate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BumRushDaShow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:02 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. I'm surprised it was moved and moved here to this forum! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:13 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. I can only guess that it may not be LBN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BumRushDaShow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:17 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. True, since no other outlet is reporting it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:19 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. And who reads Drudge? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BumRushDaShow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:27 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. The same folks who check out Free Republic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:37 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. how do you know Drudge is running it? Oh, wait... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BumRushDaShow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:40 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. There are those of us who monitor the other side. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:46 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. I get it. You "monitor," Others "read." bwahahahahahaha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BumRushDaShow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:53 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. I get it. You don't. Bwaaahhahahahahaha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:08 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. oh, I get it. The only way you know if something is on drudge is because YOU read drudge! LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BumRushDaShow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:15 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. You don't know the difference between "monitor" and "read"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:18 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. oh, so you check drudge's site traffic, server load, links in and out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BumRushDaShow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. Yawn. Sorry wrong answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. What other sites do you rea.. um... I mean "monitor?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BumRushDaShow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:34 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. CNN, MSNBC, CSPAN, Weather.com, Weather.gov, Kos, Huffington |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:38 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. so you don't WATCH CNN, you monitor it. You don't READ Kos, you monitor it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BumRushDaShow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:41 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. Exactly A shame you don't understand. And welcome to ignore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:43 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. ha ha. Wait! You came back. I'm sure you'll still "monitor" me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 05:13 PM Response to Reply #65 |
70. I'm surprised he wasn't ignored long ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lamp_shade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
9. How the hell would they know? This kills me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
10. My first choice was Bill Richarson, but I'm totally cool with Hillary, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
12. This story is part of the Clinton SoS P.R. Steamroll going on... good luck with that, Hillaryland. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
15. Sorry but I'll wait until Obama announces it. I would LIKE it to be true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
17. That's odd. Just yesterday, Podesta said no cabinet appointments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
20. It doesn't make sense. I don't believe it. The article claims |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
30. I see this from two different perspectives... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
31. I never trust UK papers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:11 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Isn't The Guardian run by Rupert Murdoch? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:16 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. No, I don't believe so. The Guardian is considered to be left-leaning. I should clarify that I don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:25 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. Oh...I think it's The Sun I'm thinking of. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:27 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. The Times, and The Sunday Times, too. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
34. Yay! 4 - 8 years of Clinton DRAMA in the Whitehouse! Go Hillary for Drama! (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cosmic Charlie (684 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
40. too bad she hasn't been offered anything yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
43. Great!!! This is going to be awesome. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
45. Right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarjorieG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
46. If Hilllary gets this, with thoughtfulness, so be it. Don't like Clintonistas push. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
47. That would be some damn fine news right there! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erin Elizabeth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
49. Nah, not true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
52. I'm still saying she won't accept it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
59. That's nice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
63. Congratulations to Sen. Clinton, if true. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
codjh9 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
68. I'm fine with that, and I think the Freepers will only go MORE nuc-u-lar about it. :^) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
69. Now that this episode is over, will the Palin threads start popping up in large numbers again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Sep 20th 2024, 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC