marylanddem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 02:32 PM
Original message |
|
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 02:33 PM by marylanddem
They represent Joe Lieberman, whose smiling corrupt face was in every single fucking campaign photograph of John McCain. There is NO upside to this Lieberman issue. I am a proud Democrat who will not contribute another dime to the Democratic party until Lieberman is out of the Senate.
|
wryter2000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It seems the people of CT will have to do what our "leadership" couldn't.
|
ben_meyers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. What would give you any indication that the people of CT |
|
won't re-elect him again if he runs? Seems that enough of them are perfectly happy with him.
|
wryter2000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Actually, it was the Republicans of CT who elected him the last time. The Republicans put up a guy with a well-known gambling problem. He got 10% of the vote.
|
Stuckinthebush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The acceptance of Joe shows the middle that the Dems aren't playing the same bullshit partisan games. The middle/independent voters don't give a damn that Lieberman campaigned for McCain. What they will see is that the Dems aren't like the Bushies and punish dissenters. This will go a long way to squelch any arguments about partisanship from the GOP. After all, Lieberman may be a committee chairman but the Senate majority leader has a lot of power telling the committee chairs what to do.
It gives us one more vote. Even if we don't get to the 60 because of Georgia, we will be at 59 (or maybe 58). It is a lot easier to pull one GOP vote than it is to pull two.
As a hyper partisan, I would never have allowed it. I'm glad the hyper partisans aren't running the show.
|
Thrill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The Democrats in the Senate have always been pussies |
|
Why is anyone surprised by this?
|
monmouth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Where oh where is Ms Nancy in all of this? ..n/t |
|
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 02:43 PM by monmouth
|
onenote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. In the House of Representatives, which has nothing to do with this. |
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Its a Senate issue. This has nothing to do with her |
wryter2000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. In the House of Representatives n/t |
mtnsnake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. Right where she's been since we won the majority in 2006, in bed with Bush. n/t |
monmouth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
11. Ahh, sorry, my bad. I'm so used to seeing her next to Hairy.....n/t |
LostinVA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
12. I wasn't aware Pelosi has suddenly become a Senator |
screembloodymurder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 12th 2024, 08:15 AM
Response to Original message |