Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-19-08 06:32 PM
Original message |
Okay, let's define "progressive." |
|
Nothing but your definitions of what you consider to be progressive. Have at it.
|
MNDemNY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-19-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Folks who agree with....... |
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-19-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. whatever you are I am more |
|
If your 87.99 on the liberal scale I am 94.39.
If your 203.92 then I am 284.93.
I am more progressive and I can't wait until Obama is sworn in has to make real decisions on real issues involving real political trade offs so that I can engage in my imaginary ideological warfare over imaginary issues with anonymous people to show that I never compromise and retain my ideological purety.
|
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-19-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
MNDemNY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-19-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. No f'n way!!! I am at least a 5693.4, only slightly to the right |
|
of Karl Marx, so there!:P
|
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-19-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message |
2. While you're at it, get people to define "moderate" |
iamthebandfanman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-19-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. a moderate is someone who |
|
makes threads mocking anyone who doesnt want to agree with them or refuses to be satisfied and thus wont fall into line with their every ideology has merit mantra.
you tell me whos better, because to me all i see on du is so called moderates and so called progressives saying the same thing about each other.
|
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-19-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. That could be a new DU category: Moderately Progressive |
|
Or Progressively Moderate
|
panader0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-19-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Literally and politically: To progress. |
|
Conservative means stay with the old ways, liberal means your mind is open, progressive means to keep up with the times. We can't return to the fifties or nineties or stay where we are. We need to progress and that's progress.
|
Liberal_Stalwart71
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-19-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
14. Which is why I argued in my thread that one can be progressive and not |
|
politically liberal. You have a good definition here. Better than mine.
|
H2O Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-19-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message |
7. A progressive movement |
|
is one that makes progress; a progressive individual likewise is one who makes progress. It is not limited to a way of thinking, although certain ways of thinking limit the progress that groups and/or individuals can make.
|
DCBob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-19-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
-- anti-war unless clearly no other option -- fairness to all no matter what gender, race, sexual persuasion, religion, etc. -- freedom of expression and ideas even if it offends some -- respect and consideration of the environment even if it means compromising corporate/business/national progress
There is more but these are my most important "progressive" issues.
|
Breeze54
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-19-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message |
10. The opposite of conservative and repuke. |
Median Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-19-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message |
11. I Think Many Folks Use Labels As A Substitute For Analysis and Critical Thought |
|
For example, you have DU'ers complaining that Hillary is too conservative to be SoS, and you have former Clinton confident, Dick Morris, saying that Hillary Clinton is even more liberal and left of Obama on foriegn policy matters. Both accusations are equally uninformative, because no specific issues and stances are being discussed.
Personally, I wish I could just block all of the idealogical purity and label threads because they just invite flamewars that typically leave one dumber for having read them. The better approach is to examine and discuss the issues that are causing you to oppose a candidate, rather than engage in idealogical name-calling.
For example, does Hillary oppose Obama's commitment to withdraw from Iraq? Does she oppose Obama's commitment to fix the war in Afganistan? Does she oppose his commitment to more diplomacy? If not, then there is no problem.
|
Gregorian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-19-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message |
13. One who's political goals |
|
include betterment of the society through broad acceptance and kindness.
One who is politically inclusive.
|
Breeze54
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-19-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 01:41 PM
Response to Original message |