Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Progressivism IS Pragmatism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 08:45 AM
Original message
Progressivism IS Pragmatism
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/12/15/231238/35">Progressivism is Pragmatism: Steven Chu at Department of Energy

David Roberts, Grist.com

Dec. 16th, 2008

I've been reading the discussion sparked by Chris Hayes' latest piece in The Nation -- "The Pragmatist," about Obama's much-discussed pragmatism -- with interest. Pragmatism is a subject dear to my heart, something I studied in grad school, though the kind you study there and what goes by the name in political discussion bear little resemblance.

Hayes is absolutely on point here:

... pragmatism requires an openness to the possibility of radical solutions. It demands a skepticism not just toward the certainties of ideologues and dogmatism but also of elite consensus and the status quo. This is a definition of pragmatism that is in almost every way the opposite of its invocation among those in the establishment. For them, pragmatism means accepting the institutional forces that severely limit innovation and boldness; it means listening to the counsel of the Wise Men; it means not rocking the boat.


I won't rehash the whole discussion, but something relevant to Gristian subjects popped up today. Andrew Sullivan draws attention to what he calls a "great comment" over at The American Conservative, under a post by Daniel Larison. The commenter says this:

One of the best examples of Obama's pragmatism is his appointment of Chu as energy secretary. Imagine that, and actual expert scientist in charge of energy research and development! Rather than a politician or military official or a "green" progressive environmentalist, Obama picked a guy who actually knows science. Is this being "centrist", or is it being pragmatic in the real sense of the word.


This misses something crucial: Chu is a "'green' progressive environmentalist." Read this or this and tell me he's not. He's a progressive environmentalist because he "actually knows science." He says we must act boldly because circumstances, if seen clearly, demand boldness.

*snip*


*****

More at above link. Links to the mentioned Chris Hayes and Daniel Larison articles provided as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC