S_E_Fudd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-05-09 12:35 PM
Original message |
MN Supreme Court Rejects Coleman's request... |
camera obscura
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-05-09 12:38 PM
Response to Original message |
Thrill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-05-09 12:39 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Give it up Norm. Its over |
democrattotheend
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-05-09 01:11 PM
Response to Original message |
3. So does Coleman have any other options? |
|
Or does he have no choice but to concede now?
|
Bjorn Against
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-05-09 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. He doesn't have any credible options |
|
That doesn't mean he won't push some frivolous lawsuits though.
|
Torgo Johnson
(797 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-05-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Norm is going to file so many frivolous lawsuits.... |
|
it will make Phillip J. Berg blush.
|
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-05-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
10. He hasn't used up his "holding his breath" option. nm |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-05-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message |
|
the Minnesota Court turned down the appeal on the rejected absentee ballots from repuke leaning areas?
They must have been really not in the lawful parameters?
Remember in 2000 when lieman wanted to take the absentee ballots from the military that were sent in after the date required?
|
Bjorn Against
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-05-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. They were all rejected for legal reasons. |
|
If the Supreme Court were to accept the counting of ballots that were legally rejected it would open a huge can of worms and the Franken campaign would inevitibly be back with a new list of ballots they wanted to be counted. There is no way they could justify counting legally rejected ballots but only doing so in Republican counties like Coleman is suggesting.
Coleman knew from the beginning this lawsuit had no chance, he is just trying to make people think that there are votes that should have been counted but weren't so that people will doubt the election results.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-05-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. Thanks..Of course coleman and |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-05-09 01:33 PM by zidzi
his gang of obfuscators are up to their usual filthy tricks.
Fortunately, somehow Franken was able to get some more votes. I wasn't following it closely.
|
Jennicut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-05-09 01:26 PM
Response to Original message |
8. All right! Does this mean Al is Senator yet? |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 14th 2024, 08:21 PM
Response to Original message |