shraby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-22-06 02:37 PM
Original message |
There was another leak that the media has forgotten. |
|
The one that happened when the Dems were having their convention before the election and got Pakistan's underwear in a bunch. He was a double agent working in Pakistan that Pakistan had flipped to help gather intel on Al Queda. The administration gave his name to the news media and blew his cover. I think his name was Noor. How come that leak isn't being punished???? Answer..because Condi Rice gave his name out.
|
alfredo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-22-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
1. You're right about that. didn't someone give out our battle plan |
shraby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-22-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. That one about the battle plan went into the memory hole |
|
almost as quick as it popped up.
|
alfredo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-22-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. I seem to remember Chalabi having access to the plan. I seem |
|
to remember he gave them to the Iranians, but I am not too sure about that.
|
Ian David
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-22-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Oh yeah! I forgot about that! Good catch! n/t |
madeline_con
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-22-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Do you have a link? n/t |
shraby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-22-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Edited on Sat Apr-22-06 02:56 PM by shraby
< http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/1/5/135154/4164> There are links to the news stories in this article.
|
William Seger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-22-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Oh, that wasn't a "leak"... |
|
... is was just a... uh... spontaneous declassification. Yeah, that's the ticket.
|
newswolf56
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-22-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Still think it's tinfoil hat-thinking to argue that the chaos in Iraq... |
|
is administration POLICY?
It's increasingly self-evident it's part of a long-range plan to make the Middle East safe for capitalism by imposing Islamic theocracy. Indeed -- and about this there is no debate at all -- the plan itself dates back to the first year of the Eisenhower Administration, 1953, when the United states began financing the resurrection of Islamic Fundamentalism for precisely that reason: to counteract the increasing popularity of Marxism in the Middle East.
Same theory, by the way, under which Christian theocracy is being imposed on the United States: to make the nation safe for capitalism by suppressing any and all potential of dissent -- deliberate restoration of the Christian Dark Ages, this time forever.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 14th 2024, 02:39 AM
Response to Original message |