madfloridian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-18-08 02:35 PM
Original message |
It will be over by February 5th |
Selatius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-18-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message |
1. That kind of rank arrogance earned her all the trouble she has now. Foolish. nt |
speedoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-18-08 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Well, something was over by Feb. 5th, but it was not the nomination. |
|
It was her absurd inevitableness.
|
Laughing Mirror
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-18-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message |
w13rd0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-18-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
With astute judgement like that, when she sets a goal for when we'll be leaving Iraq, I believe her o.O
The problem with Clinton is that she exists in linear time. If time were more shaped like bubbles, or torus loops, and parallel lines did cross were you to focus real hard, then she'd be top bananna.
Many of the things she's done, were they to exist on their own, and out of context, they'd make perfect sense. But line them all up, and she sounds... unrealistic and otherwordly, like, her own world. Even when the meme was that her nomination was inevitable, I never could get a clear answer as to positive reasons to vote FOR her other than "she'll be the nominee, you better just accept it."
|
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-18-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message |
5. DUPLICITY ---> thy name is Clinton. |
corkhead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-18-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message |
6. she was right, it was over Feb 5th. That was when it became apparent that she was toast. |
barbtries
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-18-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message |
|
killed the campaign. what a monumental mistake for her. oh well.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 12:56 PM
Response to Original message |