Avidor
(952 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-08-10 06:58 AM
Original message |
Bachmann MN Senate Ethics Smackdown (2005) |
|
http://dumpbachmann.blogspot.com/2010/06/michele-bachmanns-ethics-problems.htmlBy Karl Bremer Last week’s ethics hearing on a Minnesota state senator brought back memories of one of Michele Bachmann’s less-than-finer moments in her unremarkable senate career. Let’s take a trip in the Wayback Machine for a look at yet another one of Bachmann’s ethical lapses.
|
baldguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-08-10 07:23 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Clueless, totally clueless. |
activa8tr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-08-10 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Consistently clueless from the very start, I'd say, and her voice is so |
|
hard to listen to. How could ANYONE have wanted her in Congress??
|
TheEuclideanOne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-10-10 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
She knows exactly what she is doing. She is playing stupid and trying to spin her blatant violation of the rules by promoting a company for her own commercial gain as if she is helping bring jobs to Minnesota.
If I was a senator and could promote a company that hired me by publicly promoting them on the Senate floor, that would be worth a pretty penny!!! I might get paid a lot of money. Of course, the payment would be for other work I did, not for the promotion I did for the company, wink wink.
|
herbm
(980 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-09-10 07:49 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Lets see the ad. She sure is clueless regarding the function of newsgathering in a legislature in a |
WhoIsNumberNone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-09-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 15th 2024, 06:34 PM
Response to Original message |