Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now that Fidel has retired, is there ANY reason Dems shouldn't push for normalization with Cuba?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 01:07 AM
Original message
Now that Fidel has retired, is there ANY reason Dems shouldn't push for normalization with Cuba?
Isn't it time to admit, once and for all, that the Cold War is over and that a small grand of bitter, spiteful racist right-wing millionaire exiles should no longer dictate U.S. policy towards a country that, for forty-seven years, has done nothing whatsoever to us?

Are any amount of fundraising checks worth keeping our party in a hardline stance against reality?

Cuba is Cuba, and it isn't OUR place to force it to become Little Havana South. The U.S. has never had a legitimate right to interefere in that island's affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. The RW has big plans for what they want to do with Cuba
They would like nothing better than to bring them some Democracy. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Probably when there are no Castro's running the country...
IMO, they'll wait when the brother's not in power before making any real moves to normalize relations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, yeah...his brother is still running things...
...not that I ever agreed with the embargo, but the situation really hasn't changed.

That aside, the Pope could become the new President of Cuba and the U.S. would still need time to formally open diplomatic relations again. Nothing happens overnight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. Fidel, was never the "real" problem.
Just like Usama bin Laden is not HIMSELF the problem, it's the value of his image.
It's all about putting a face on the stick I intend to beat you with. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Still, you gotta admit the whole "Red Scare" thing is outdated and laughable.
Why, for instance, did we normalize relations with China? It's all about projection - the evil Islamists, the Communists, the "Axes of Eeeeevil". Even more so (lame) considering our own civil and human rights record.

As Georgie would say "We need enemas to catapult the propaganda over."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. I Have Read That Many Od The Younger Generation Of Cubans
who were raised here want to normalize relations with Cuba.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. I heard Obama mumbling something about opening...
up to Cuba, but for most politicians it's a "can't win" issue so why bother if they don't have to. Acter all, many of us care about Cuba, but how many REALLY care.

Safest way is to promise nothing but "staying the course" and some bullshit about waiting for Cuba to make changes.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. Normalizing
There hasn't been any reason not to for years now. Castro has nothing to do with it. Once Nixon opened relations with China, the last arguement for the embargo disappeared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. Fidel isn't even relevant. This idiocy should have stopped long ago.
How come we can trade with the truly hideous Chinese regime?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KillCapitalism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'm all for normalizing relations with Cuba.
It should be done properly however. None of this Bush-style forced democracy and predatory capitalism.

Let's lift the embargo, send some monetary and food aid their way, and slowly work to convince them that free speech, freedom of press, and free elections will be good for the people. Raul seems open to such change possibly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I fully agree. If there's one thing we've clearly established
It's that the United States has no moral authority and no right to impose anything on Cuba whatsoever. We forfeited that right forever when we denied Cuba independence after the Spanish American war, a denial based on our turn of the 20th century political "experts" fear of another independent nonwhite country in the Caribbean next to Haiti.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
11.  A good start would be to abandon the base at Guantanamo....
...if for no other reason than to cut back on the ridiculous amount of money it must cost to keep the place operating (even fresh water has to be shipped in, I believe). Hanging onto Gitmo for all these years seems more out of spite than because of military necessity or national security. Moreover, if the current usage of the base -the detainment of 'terrorists'- took place on mainland US territory, people might pay closer attention to the situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. The Embargo is stupid & counter productive.
On the other hand, is there a difference between Fidel & Raul?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC