Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court Upholds Dismissal Of Agent-Orange Suits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 07:49 PM
Original message
Court Upholds Dismissal Of Agent-Orange Suits
Court Upholds Dismissal Of Agent-Orange Suits
Dow Jones
February 22, 2008: 02:31 PM EST

(Adds comments from lawyer for Vietnamese plaintiffs, Dow spokesman beginning ninth paragraph.)

By Chad Bray

Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES


NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- A federal appeals court Friday upheld the dismissal of more than a dozen lawsuits brought against Dow Chemical Co. (DOW), Monsanto Co. (MON) and other chemical makers over the use of the herbicide Agent Orange during the Vietnam War.

The lawsuits include separate cases brought on behalf of veterans and their families and millions of Vietnamese allegedly injured by exposure to the chemical defoliant.

In the cases brought by the veterans, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with a prior ruling by U.S. District Judge Jack Weinstein in Brooklyn in 2004 that the chemical companies could assert a government-contractor defense, which protects government contractors from state-tort liability under certain circumstances when they provide defective products to the government.

"The government made an express determination, based on the knowledge available to it at the time, that Agent Orange as then being manufactured posed no unacceptable hazard for the wartime uses for which it was intended, and that the product should continue to be manufactured and supplied to it," U.S. Circuit Judge Robert D. Sack wrote in one of three opinions in the cases.

more...

http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200802221431DOWJONESDJONLINE000784_FORTUNE5.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. This case just goes to show what an issue-laundering machine the US judiciary really is ...
there are more creeps going around pushing this kind of oppression in the rotund name of the "law" than imaginable or needed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC