malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-22-08 08:03 PM
Original message |
Abrams on the Rove Subpoena |
|
Inherent contempt. Siegelman will speak.
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-22-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Locked up in the basement of Congress! AHA AHAHAHAHAHAHA |
|
BBBBBBBBBBBBWAAAAAAAA ROFLMAO :rofl:
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-22-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Botany
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-22-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message |
MadMaddie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-22-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Siegelman has a good point about going after the lower |
|
Edited on Thu May-22-08 08:09 PM by MadMaddie
people who can't claim Executive Priviledge.....yes...that is the way to do it.
|
alfredo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-22-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. That's how they busted the Mafia. |
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-22-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
10. John Dean said the same thing, about going after the little guys first |
|
which will lead them to the bigger fish. Sounds logical to me.
|
Ilsa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-22-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Siegelman says we need to go after the non-Executive branch |
|
parties as well. They won't be able to take the heat, and someone will start pointing fingers at Rove ordering the political prosecutions.
|
Old Codger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-22-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
use *'s means of interrogation, after all it is legal by his laws ain't it
|
Ilsa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-22-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Welcome to DU, George65! I love the way you think! LOL nt |
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-22-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 11th 2024, 05:58 PM
Response to Original message |