I know we are all against Gitmo, but it wouldn't it be kind of sweet if Liz Trotta ended up as a

[Pushed To The Left]

prisoner there due to her terrorist-like comments? :evilgrin: She seems like a "person of interest" to me!

[Vinca]

1. Changes your mind about waterboarding, doesn't it? nt

[jwirr]

2. There won't be room for her. Gitmo is a perfect holding tank and

trial sight for the war crimes trials for *ss and co.

[halliburtonsux]

3. ? I'm not 'against' Gitmo. I just want to see different people in there...

getting waterboarded and awaiting execution.
And, after that takes place, Halliburton/KBR will be down one former board member.
:rofl:

[Ikonoklast]

4. Unleashing that hag on the prisoners held at Gitmo

Would surely be construed as a war crime.

[T Monk]

5. even gitmo's too good for fox

[blonndee]

6. But there's actually evidence that SHE might be a you-know-what.

Therefore, she doesn't qualify to be there.

[PeaceNikki]

7. I'd rather do away with Gitmo, Abu Ghraib, torture and abuse altogether.

[Canuckistanian]

8. I'd settle for a good, old fashioned P4W

With unsupervised showers and a bunkmate named "Ilsa"

[pinto]

9. No.

eom