swag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-30-08 03:36 PM
Original message |
McClellan Confessions Spark Media Denial (FAIR Media Advisory) |
|
Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan's forthcoming book has caused a political firestorm by offering unusually blunt criticisms of the Bush White House. But McClellan has also aimed his fire at the news media, accusing mainstream reporters of being "deferential, complicit enablers" instead of challenging the White House's case for the Iraq War. The reaction from many in the elite media demonstrates that the White House is not the only institution that resents being held accountable.
During a joint appearance on NBC's Today show (5/28/08), network anchors Brian Williams, Charles Gibson and Katie Couric offered their assessments of the media's performance. While Couric conceded that the press could have done more in the face of various pressures, calling McClellan's critique "fairly accurate," NBC's Williams offered a somewhat incoherent defense of the media:
I've always put it this way. In Katrina, the evidence was right next to us. Sadly, we saw fellow Americans, in some cases, floating past face down. We knew what had just happened. We weren't allowed that kind of proximity with the weapons inspectors. I was in Kuwait for the buildup of the war. And yes, we heard from the Pentagon on my cell phone the minute they heard us report something that they didn't like. The tone of that time was quite extraordinary.
Given that the inspections process was well-documented by the United Nations--and well-covered by reporters who were interested in independent reporting (Extra!, 3-4/06)-- Williams' point is difficult to follow. It was no less obscure when ABC's Gibson made the same point on the CBS Early Show (5/28/08): "I think that the media did a pretty good job of focusing and asking the questions. We were not given access to get into the country... to go along with the inspectors."
This notion that there was no way of countering official claims is false. As FAIR pointed out shortly after Colin Powell's United Nations presentation ("A Failure of Skepticism in Powell Coverage," 2/10/03), there was plenty of information on the record that questioned Powell's claims. Associated Press reporter Charles Hanley, for example, reported two weeks prior to the Powell speech (1/18/03) that weapons inspectors were finding nothing incriminating at the sites identified by the U.S. and Britain: "In almost two months of surprise visits across Iraq, U.N. arms monitors have inspected 13 sites identified by U.S. and British intelligence agencies as major 'facilities of concern,' and reported no signs of revived weapons building."
. . .
|
Mountainman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-30-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message |
1. All of us knew they war was based on lies. Did we all have some mystical revelation at the same |
|
Edited on Fri May-30-08 03:52 PM by Mountainman
time? No we read the international press! The whole fucking world knew it was based on lies. Only our own media was too chicken shit to report it!
|
Tangerine LaBamba
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-30-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
How come I knew the march to the invasion of Iraq was bogus, but these "professionals" didn't?
They owe me their salaries. I was right and they were wrong.
I'll accept checks.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 12th 2024, 08:02 PM
Response to Original message |