Midwest_Doc
(548 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 11:19 PM
Original message |
New Supreme Court Justices! |
drm604
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 11:22 PM
Response to Original message |
|
In all of the excitement I didn't even think about that. :bounce:
|
BanTheGOP
(596 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. It is IMPORTANT to get YOUNG JUDGES ON THE COURT! |
|
It is VERY IMPORTANT to get young, brilliant progressive judges on the Supreme Court. We should encourage the members whom are retiring to retire in the first two years, so we can have an UNSTOPPABLE nomination.
That nominations should be given to progressive judges who are under 30 years of age, if possible, and will commit to staying in great shape all of his/her life so that we can have at LEAST a half-century of consistent, progressive interpretations of the US Constitution. If we can get at LEAST two judges to leave during the first two years, then we can ensure that we can legislate from the bench if necessary.
In addition, we should fill EVERY judge vacancy with young, progressive judges as soon as possible. I would submit that we should put a litmus test on the ages of federal judges at 40. This should be a HIGH PRIORITY, and we should fill out the federal slate of appellate and regional federal judges by 2009.
|
Justpat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message |
3. This is what has me get up and dance around the house. |
|
Thank God we get to appoint sane human being to the highest court in our land.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 09:33 PM
Response to Original message |