Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Alert! PLEASE Do NOT eat Bluefin Tuna (used in Sushi)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 05:33 PM
Original message
Alert! PLEASE Do NOT eat Bluefin Tuna (used in Sushi)
Edited on Fri Nov-28-08 05:54 PM by G_j
One of the most amazing and beautiful fish in the ocean is on the verge of extinction.
Not just suggesting a boycott, but a last ditch effort to SAVE these fish!



http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1862255,00.html

The Sushi Wars: Can the Bluefin Tuna Be Saved?
By Vivienne Walt Friday, Nov. 28, 2008

If an army marches on its stomach, then the key item in the kit bags of the Roman legions that conquered southern Europe about 2,000 years was dried bluefin tuna. But having survived the demands of the Roman conquest, the species — each of which can weigh as much as 1,500 pounds and live as long as 40 years — might finally have met its match in the contemporary global appetite for sushi.

If environmentalists and marine scientists are right, the world's remaining stocks of bluefin tuna, 90% of which are in the Mediterranean, could be on the verge of extinction. Says Alain Fonteneau, a marine biologist for France's government-run Institute for Development Research in Montpellier: "If we do nothing, in five years we will fish the last bluefin tuna."

But not everyone is ready to heed the warning. A week-long international meeting to save the species ended in splenetic arguments Monday night, as European officials thwarted a proposal by the U.S. and environmental groups to impose a partial moratorium on bluefin fishing and to drastically reduce catch quotas.

Officials from the 46 members of the International Consortium for the Conservation of the Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) had spent days behind closed doors in the Moroccan city of Marrakesh, battling over a rescue plan for the species. Several smaller ICCAT members such as Guatemala and Panama had initially backed a proposal supported by the U.S. and environmental groups to halt all bluefin fishing for nine months of the year, and to crack down hard on violators. But European officials persuaded them to instead adopt a reduced quota of 22,000 tons in 2009, and 19,950 tons in 2011. That certainly represents a sharp drop from last year's estimated global sales of 61,000 tons of bluefin tuna — and even from this year's official quota of about 29,000 tons — but it's still far above the 15,000 tons that marine scientists advise is the limit that can be fished without without the species becoming extinct.

..more..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/26/the-tuna-tragedy-of-the-commons/?hp

November 26, 2008, 2:22 pm

The (Tuna) Tragedy of the Commons
By Andrew C. Revkin

There was new evidence early this week that the world has not yet absorbed just how deeply humans have depleted our “exhausted oceans.” At the latest meeting of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, created under a treaty 42 years ago to manage shared fisheries in that ocean, European governments ignored a strong recommendation from the group’s own scientific advisers for deep cuts in some harvests of the Atlantic bluefin tuna. On its face, that would seem to be a strange development considering that the organization’s Web site says flatly: “Science underpins the management decisions made by I.C.C.A.T.”

But such moves seem unremarkable, for now, in a world seeking to manage limited, shared natural resources while also spurring economic growth — whether the resource is the global atmosphere or an extraordinary half-ton, ocean-roaming predator. The European stance — insisting on a harvest in the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean 50 percent above the limit recommended by scientists — was sharply criticized by environmental campaigners, marine biologists and United States fisheries officials. Some biologists criticized the United States, as well, for playing down the role of American fishers, both recreational and commercial, in destroying the once-bountiful fishery.

But the biggest focus was on Europe. Biologists and American fisheries officials blamed European governments for failing to shrink the huge fleets of boats from France (771), Italy (619), Spain (441), England (331) and elsewhere that are acknowledged, even by Europe, to be too large for the fishery. Environmental campaigners have repeatedly reported on rampant, enormous illegal catches in European and international waters, as well. Given that tagging studies have shown that the half-ton tuna can roam the full span of the Atlantic in seeking breeding and feeding grounds, the European position is widely seen by fisheries specialists as sending the fabled species spiraling further toward outright collapse. At the center of the fight, spurred largely by the worldwide sushi trade, is one of nature’s most magnificent, and endangered, experiments — a transatlantic torpedo that can sprint at highway speed while warming its brain with energy from its muscles.

..more..

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://features.csmonitor.com/environment/2008/11/28/new-bluefin-catch-rule-riles-scientists/


New bluefin catch rule riles scientists

Environmentalists say despite reducing catch quotas, the decision of an international regulatory commission stops short of adequately safeguarding the fragile bluefin population.

By Lisa Abend| Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor/ November 28, 2008 edition

Madrid
The International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) this week moved to reduce bluefin tuna fishing quotas in the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean by less than was hoped for by some – a controversial decision that the European Commission supports but that critics say will irrevocably damage an already fragile tuna population.

The new levels still far exceed those recommended for safeguarding the population, scientists who work in the field say, and may drive the wild fish the ICCAT is supposed to protect into extinction.

“There are only 25,000 to 30,000 adult bluefins in the region,” says Brian MacKenzie, professor of fisheries at Technical University of Denmark and lead scientist of a major study on tuna populations. “The quota that ICCAT approved this week will basically take all of them.” Sebastián Losada, a Greenpeace spokesman who attended the meeting, was even more direct. “The game’s over.”
...more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. You have my word on it.
Not much help, considering. But I hope many follow this advice. Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
37. Mine too. and K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RidinMyDonkey Donating Member (290 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. I will not eat any tuna
I already don't eat it so it will be easy for me to give up hehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't eat Sushi
I rarely eat Tuna too.

Mostly because of the scare of Mercury in the fish but now I won't even eat one mouthful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtbymark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. This would be Moguru, not Himachi
If you order Himachi for your sushi, that's yellow fin. Moguru would be blue fin, but being from the left coast, all of our tuna (i would hasten to guess) is from the Pacific.

:loveya: the sush~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. No problem, I've given up eating most seafood and other fish
That's due to all the mercury and other contaminants that fish are carrying these days. About the only fish that I eat are the ones that I catch personally from places that I know are clean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. NO sushi sould ever be consumed
Edited on Fri Nov-28-08 06:19 PM by leftchick
wtf is it with the Japanese anyway? They think all of these species are here forever? The same can be said for the USA in other areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Sushi is seasoned rice.
I'm pretty sure rice isn't in danger of extinction. (The other ingredients in sushi are vinegar--also made from rice--and sugar and salt.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonEBrook Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Many people don't distinguish sushi from sashimi. As in don't know the difference.
:-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Indeed.
:hi: Welcome to DU.

Plenty of sushi dishes can be made with sustainable seafood, or without any seafood at all. I've rolled my own with vegetables from my garden, with mushrooms, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. There is fish in Sushi....
Edited on Fri Nov-28-08 08:40 PM by AsahinaKimi


And as for "WTF is it with Japanese, anyway.." Japan is an Island Nation. Its always had fish as
apart of its menu. The truth is most Japanese don't eat Sushi or Sashimi every day. Japanese have sushi as much as most people go out and have a steak, maybe once a month. Most of the food consumed is stuff like Udon and Ramen noodle. There are lots of regional Japanese food. For example, okonomiyaki in Hiroshima, sanuki udon noodles in Kagawa, miso-katsu (deep fried pork with miso sauce) in Nagoya, kiritanpo in Akita, Kyo-ryori in Kyoto, goya chanpuru in Okinawa, and so on.


Udon


Teppan Yakatori

Some of the best Beef in Japan comes from Kobi.

Eating meat from four legged animals was prohibited in Japan for more than a thousand years prior to 1868. This ban was especially strict during the Edo Period (1603-1867). Buddhist influences were primarily responsible for this dietary restriction, but other cultural factors and the need to protect draught animals in times of famine may have reinforced the taboo. After the Meiji Restoration in 1868, the new leaders of Japan wanted, among other things, to reduce traditional social barriers and to encourage the adoption of beneficial Western habits. There may also have been a desire to weaken the power of the Buddhists. Lifting the ban on the eating of meat was a small step towards these objectives. continues...
http://www.luciesfarm.com/artman/publish/article_37.shtml


Being of Japanese and Korean decent, I am proud of my heritage.. and I enjoy the foods
that my people eat. I am not too happy about the Whaling.. and agree Japan must stop
that practice..But I think Japan has many, many good qualities.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Sushi is seasoned rice, nothing more.
Your illustration is of maki (though I can't tell exactly what kind), which contain sushi, among other ingredients.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sushi

(Yes, it's wikipedia, but it's decent.)

Plenty of sushi dishes--maki, nigiri, chirashi--have fish in them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. what I've been told
is that Sushi is rice and Nori.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shardik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. What's wrong with Sushi? ave a nice California Roll.
Not my favorite but a great starting point in learning to enjoy the flavors.

Wasabi and ginger: Mmmmmmm!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. don't eat any fish - except perhaps for fresh-water farmed....
fish "farmed" in the ocean are prone to infestations which spread to the wild stock, as well as escaping to poison the gene pool of wild fish.

Msongs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
33. actually, it varies. for example, you should avoid farmed salmon and look for wild caught
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lethe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. grow your own sushi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetrusMonsFormicarum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Eat Oregon Albacore
One of the most successful sustainable fisheries stories in recent years, Oregon albacore is a virtually untapped tuna resource right off the northwest coast. These are small, lean tunas, hardly near the top of the food chain. Just as the Pacific Northwest coast was suffering under a seven-year ban on snapper catching, Oregon albacore came on the scene and kept coastal communites working.

Sorry, can't forgo tuna, it's unreplaceable in my kitchen. Mercury is not a consideration because moderation is the key. Bluefin I can forgo, and have ever since it's been on the red list published by the Monterey Bay Aquarium. The Bluefin is (sadly) just one of dozens of potentially endangered or overharvested species.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonEBrook Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. When I was a kid in the 1950s my mom would say "the oceans can feed all people forever"
which probably seemed like a reasonable belief back then before we knew that vast stretches of ocean really never hosted significant populations of seafood.
I feel bad for sharks as well...thousands of them are caught,, have their fins cut off for soup and are thrown back alive to sink and die because they cannot
swim. That REALLY pisses me off.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lethe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. yeah they have to keep moving
sharks don't have swim bladders

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonEBrook Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I'm not opposed to eating sharks in principle but I'm very offended by wasting (and abusing) them
in that way...it reminds me of how certain cultures keep alive the idiotic beliefs about the gall bladders of bears having aphrodisiac properties. I despise that kind of deliberate ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. That's before they started using in a huge way for livestock feed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonEBrook Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I guess I never heard that...do you mean tuna or fish in general?
I can't imagine cows wanting to eat fish...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. It's non primary fish, but it screws with the larger fish stocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonEBrook Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yes that's a huge problem...harvesting tons of low-on-the-foodchain and bypassing
the usual progression. I see what you meant and it isn't good. But you know what?...our own species will cause our own extinction probably sooner than later and there's nothing you or I can do about it. The planet will survive our idiocy just fine, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. BTW, welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. Sushi lovers might also want to consider who is supplying the fish for this delicacy...
since a large percentage is controlled by Sun Myung Moon's "Unification Church," an organization whose ties to the Neocon agenda are pretty explicit...

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/specials/chi-0604sushi-1-story,0,3736876.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. Thank you for letting me know
I don't eat most tuna but I do eat sushi and I allow myself tuna at those times. Question, though, is all tuna bluefin tuna? If so, tuna is now completely off of my diet and really, I was making an exception with sushi. I've been thinking of giving up fish overall, because of the depletion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
23. Is that Ahi Tuna?
I love that stuff, but if it's the same thing, I won't eat it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Ahi is yellowfin, I believe.
But, uh yeah, don't eat it.

:hide: agenda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Dude. I LOVE that damned stuff.
Especially the stuff from PF Chang's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
30. ==
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
31. Most fisheries around the world are near collapse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. a wake up call, not well heeded... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. No more fish. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
35. Not just tuna: here are some details on the current level of fishery depletion
The United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has estimated that 950 million people worldwide rely on fish and shellfish for more than one-third of their animal protein. Over 200 million people depend upon fish as a main source of income, particularly subsistence fishers in developing countries. The Humane Society of the United States recognizes the significant international dependence on fishing as an industry. Our primary concerns are the gross over-exploitation of fish populations, the impact of commercial fishing activities on other, non-target marine creatures, and the growing tendency of governments and industry to blame marine mammal predation for fish stock depletion.

Fisheries Over-Exploitation

Since the 1970s, fisheries have skyrocketed to unprecedented levels of production. The FAO estimates that 70% of the world's fish species are either fully exploited or depleted. The worldwide fleet of commercial fishing vessels has doubled since 1970 and operates at a loss of 54 billion taxpayer dollars every year. The annual global catch peaked in 1989 at 89 million tons and has currently stabilized at about 85 million tons. This abuse has raised great concern within all areas of the fishing community... http://www.hsus.org/marine_mammals/what_are_the_issues/commercial_fisheries_and_marine_mammals/fisheries_factsheet.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. The annual global catch peaked in 1989
and similar to elephants , it is devastating to wipe out the larger, older members.

it seems a lot of things are 'peaking'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC