Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Microsoft giving up on Vista? (CNN)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 04:21 PM
Original message
Is Microsoft giving up on Vista? (CNN)
Microsoft's Ballmer touts 'best version of Windows ever'

By Brandon Griggs
CNN

LAS VEGAS, Nevada (CNN) -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer kicked off the 2009 International Consumer Electronics Show on Wednesday with an impassioned endorsement of PCs and a sneak peek at the company's future Windows 7 operating system.

As expected, Ballmer announced that Microsoft is releasing a beta version of Windows 7, which will be available for download beginning Friday. The news suggests the world's largest software maker may be giving up efforts to rehabilitate its often-maligned Vista operating system, which was released worldwide in January 2007.

"We are on track to deliver the best version of Windows ever," Ballmer told an audience of several thousand tech professionals and journalists inside a cavernous ballroom at the Venetian hotel. "We're working hard to get it right and get it ready."

Without mentioning the security and compatibility issues that have dogged Vista, Ballmer promised that Windows 7 will make PCs faster and easier to use. He didn't offer a timetable for its official release, although Windows Vista went on sale more than two years after it was issued in beta form.

Early reviews of Windows 7, which was leaked to the Internet in beta form in late December, have been positive. iReport.com: Will you try Windows 7? Are you attending CES?
***
more: http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/01/08/microsoft.ballmer/index.html

OP reflects CNN's original title, which changed this afternoon to something much milder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. My laptop has Vista. It SUCKS
Edited on Thu Jan-08-09 04:23 PM by MidwestTransplant
I would bet that Vista is responsible for more than a few people switching to Macs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Love my Mac at home.
Tolerate my PC at the office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. How can MS get in touch with you? They saw your endorsement --
want to feature it in their advertising. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yes We Did Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. I got a new laptop with 3 gigs of ram...
And my photoshop and golive programs work faster on my 5 year old desktop that has 1 gig of ram.

Vista sucks.

OH, and now... photoshop stalls out every time I try to open up my layer styles menu.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillWilliam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
34. Get a copy of The GiMP
It's free, doesn't crash, does everything PhotoShop does and a whole lot more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
53. I got a new desktop with 4 GB of ram & 64 bit vista & I love it, I leave multiple Adobe apps open
for weeks at a time, multiple browsers & other apps & have not had any issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. It worked for
my husband.

I have always had Mac's. Got my first one in 1987.

My husband has always had PC's - after a year of struggling with Vista and all the other crap with Microsoft and observing my computer(s) run smooth and non-problematic - He asked for a Macbook for his birthday.

He has to use PC's at his work - but he loves his new Macbook.

He uninstalled Vista and went back to his other OS... Microsoft knew it was releasing a POS when they sold Vista to the general population - What a horror show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
49. That's why I run Linux on my machines.
I barely tolerate Windows XP on them, won't tolerate Vista on them, but 99.99% of the time, I'm running Ubuntu. Much faster and leaner, less buggy and more secure. That and NO DRM!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #49
60. Another Ubuntu Linux vote....
and mine is ULTIMATE!!! That is Ubuntu Ultimate Edition. Every thing just works.

So far the only thing gave me problems is my Canon Camcorder hooked up via Firewire, but after five minutes Google, I had it working.

BTY: When I tried Vista, I came to the conclusion Vista doesn't like my AMD system. Yet XP works fine on it (swap hard drive boot) I think I'll stick with this flavor of Linux this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #49
67. I'm going to be full time Ubuntu starting next week..
I'm so excited to finally be breaking the chains. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes. They're back to MS-DOS... I mean Windows. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If only they went back to DOS, no blue screens of death there!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POR Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Exactly!!
I know I am sounding very 1985 techy with this but if you go back to DOS or UNIX you get rid of 90% of the performance issues everyone is always complaining about. Of course it would require everyone know more about PC programming but whould that be a bad thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
40. actually- it would be a GREAT thing...for Macintosh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
50. Why do you think I run Ubuntu on my systems?
Of course, I'm a software engineer with enough knowledge to get under the hood when I need to, but the current versions of the major Linux distros like Ubuntu, Fedora, etc. are very friendly to newbies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Windows hasnt used DOS since Win98
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. True, Windows XP uses the NT kernel, its technically called NT 5.1...
Edited on Thu Jan-08-09 04:37 PM by Solon
Windows 2000 is NT 5.0, Vista is 6.0 and Windows 7 is, well, 7.0.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
55. Much of Windows NT is based on RSX-11...

why can't they graduate the kernel to Unix like, you know, Linux did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. Actually, Linux was originally based on Minix, which was...
basically an educational version of POSIX compliant OSes(Unix being the granddaddy of them all). Linux is fully POSIX compliant, Windows NT only ever had partial, and even that was broken half the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #58
61. Apple has also updated to Unix with Mac OSX...

which is based on NEXT's Unix implementation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angleae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Technically Window ME was the last DOS-based.
It's still there, they just disabled the users ability to access it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Open up a command prompt... you can do it in the run window.
Even in Vista, you can still get to the little black line if you need it. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Thats cmd.com, not command.com...
All versions of Windows NT run a MS-DOS virtualization layer, or emulation layer, hence why many old DOS games and other DOS based programs are broken on Windows NT, its emulation isn't perfect, particularly because it doesn't let DOS programs have low level access to hardware, which a lot of them used to work at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
57. That's a shell, not the operating system.
There are Things You Cannot Do at the command prompt if Windows has already started. For example, you can't kill winlogon or otherwise bypass the kernel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #57
64. But, finish the thought.
Edited on Fri Jan-09-09 02:52 AM by kgfnally
"...like you can in linux."

su <--- switch to superuser

QEcz;RT.""! <--- root password

ps -uax | more <--- display all processes and pipe it to a command that pauses each screen so it doesn't scroll away

kill -9 xxxx <--- kill that process with prejudice.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
48. "Mercury is going Retrograde, you Microsofties." - Ronald Reagan's Dead Republicon Astrologer
"Get a clue, Microsoft."

- Ronald Reagan's Dead Republicon Astrologer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Faster and easier to use"?
Since when has Bill been able to provide that with his copycat chop jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yes We Did Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. It is faster... over 1000 times faster
AT CRASHING!

:rolf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. HA!
:spray:

"No more 5 minute wait times- when it's crashed, you KNOW It's crashed!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yes We Did Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. My laptop bluescreened the FIRST time I turned it on.
I've had my desktop for 5 years an NEVER had it do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
71. Just a note, Bill no longer has anything to do with M$, he left the board
about a year ago and left the CEO position a year before that. He is all Gates Foundation now.

Ballmer is in charge of M$ and knows just about nothing about software (he is a marketing guy), in the past when Ballmer went on his sales motivated tangents/rants, the geeks went to Gates and he intervened. Without Gates intervention we got Vista, that is the result of Ballmer's leadership and ignorance.

Vista is ME 2.0 a monumental kludge beyond repair that M$ is going to walk away from without even being required to offer a free replacement for.

Thanks for the billions, suckers. Here try this one, it works, sort of, maybe.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillWilliam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. In related local news from Raleigh
RedHat revenues are up 20% last year, thanks in part to Vista. NC thanks Redmond for the boost :evilgrin:

NB: I haven't used anything but Linux at home for years, though I did recently switch from Fedora to Ubuntu. (Sorry, Raleigh!) One's about as schweet as the other, but Ubuntu has a slower release cycle and more exotic hardware drivers. All bug-checked to the teeth. (Forget what you think you know about upgrades, package-adding and dependency-checking -- that's a decade old. Everything is either automagic or a mouse-click away.) You want software? Any kind of software? Go get it. It's free, too, and far more bug-checked than anything I deal with on a daily basis for Windows at work. And we pay far too much for buggy windoze shite at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I love Ubuntu to death
The only problem is that I can't get my iPod touch to work on it. It keeps telling me it's a camera when I plug it in.

It forces me to do all my ipod stuff on my laptop which is a major pain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillWilliam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I'm still getting used to it
I hate the networking, but other than that, it's pretty slick. KDE4 was a shock after being so far behind times on Fedora, but oh! the NVidia drivers work gorgeously. I've seen Vista and I've seen KDE. KDE kicks Vista's ass from here to the moon. Faster and (quelle surprise!!) no crashes. All my stuff from Fedora still works. Every. Single. Thing. I lost nothing in the move. Nothing at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I occasionally have a hangup with the system sound
But on balance it's been far more stable than any Windows release I've ever used.

Just wish the ipod was doable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #17
72. Songbird, save your money. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowledgeispwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. I'm also loving my Linux
I've been using (K)ubuntu 8.10 (I prefer KDE) and I'm impressed at how far KDE 4 is coming (I'm using KDE 4.2 beta 2). I have much fewer headaches than in Windows and I have more control over my computer. On top of that, web browsing is a lot safer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
68. Installing the madwifi drivers (needed for Atheros wifi, present on every fucking notebook)
is a fucking NIGHTMARE under Ubuntu. And Linux's native driver sucks aardvark testicles.

Under Fedora/RedHat/Centos, all you have to do is install the RPMForge RPM, yum install madwifi and off you go.

I tried Eeebuntu for the spanky new Eee PC I bought at Milwaukee* and gave up in disgust. I'm going to install Fedora shortly.


*Ask whoisalhedges, dolo amber, PeaceNikki, eyesroll, fudge stripe cookays, reprehensor, and jane_pippin about the degree of glee I was in when I bought the thing. :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I814U Donating Member (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. At the expense of being run out of town on a rail...
...I actually like Vista (please, put down the torches and pitchforks).

But after this I'm feeling what I can only label as "consumer fatigue".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yes We Did Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. The sun shines on a dogs ass some days...
Maybe you got a good copy. Although, you are the only person I have ever heard say they like it.

It's cosmetically appealing... but that's where it ends for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
54. I like Vista too, I'm glad I let go of the fear & did not cling to XP, I'll never switch to Mac..
There are too many programs only created for Windows I prefer

I prefer Homesite (no WYSIWYG) to Dreamweaver

WinSCP to Filezilla

But my biggest complaint once I was forced on to an iMac at work was when I discovered the thumbnail view I use constantly and had been using since Win 2000 did not exist.

My iMac runs Bootcamp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #16
73. Psst...
All the stuff you like about Vista was done in Linux 10 years ago.

For free.

Without the spyware, registration headaches, memory limitations, massive overhead, etc.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThisThreadIsSatire Donating Member (697 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. Do you mean to tell me
that this crap on my computer was out in beta form for two years BEFORE they released this fucked-up version????

What did it start out as, 'Pong'???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. I want nothing to do with Vista, but ...
neither do I like newer versions of the Office products, so don't trust what they might do with Windows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillWilliam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
43. I've been using OpenOffice for years now
and I interchange docs and spreadsheets with Windoze users all the time. They never know the difference. Except that at home my stuff never crashes and at work I'm always having to jump through hoops to recover stuff or bitching about what MSO won't do.

The free stuff seems to work better than the high-dollah M$ stuff every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #22
65. I'll agree completely with HW
but respond to you.

You really owe it to yourself to check out OpenOffice. OpenOffice is to MS Office as the GIMP is to Photoshop.

By the way, GIMP is awesome.

And Blender rocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Toad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #22
76. The Office suite is far worse than Vista...
Virtually everything I do routinely requires several steps more to do than on the old Office Suite - when I can figure out how to do whatever it is I want to do. I spend half my time using the Help function (which I rarely used before) typing in whatever single command I wanted to use - and getting the response, "I bet you are looking for XXX from the old Office Suite - it's been moved. Here's where we've hidden it in the new one."

If I wanted a Mac I'd buy the real thing, not a poor imitation from a competitor. The fact that Mac sales are now 7%, rather than 2%, seems to suggest that others are making the same call. Unfortunately, some of the applications I use most are not available for Mac - but in the meantime, I've reinstalled my old versions of the Office Suite everywhere I can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
25. I just had to replace my computer, and now I'm stuck with Vista.
It sucks! And Microsoft had their heads jammed up their asses when they came up with Vista.

They need to have a class action suit filed against them for screwing everyone over with an inferior shit product.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillWilliam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. My new computer came with Vista on it
and that lasted until about 5 minutes after I got it out of the shipping box. The first thing that went on it was Fedora Core 10 (loved that) and then I thought I'd give (K)Ubuntu a try (almost equally well).

Stuck? Meh, not much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
26. Vista and the beta Explorer 8 have gigantic problems. Hotmail too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. IE8b SUCKS. Vista, with SP1, is usable, but with remaining glitches.
SP1 sometimes skipped around issues than fixing them (e.g. the search button in the start menu)

Vista is still way more stable than XP, especially the 64-bit edition, but I won't be doing Win7 without one heck of an incentive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRF450 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #33
59. I'm using IE8. Its a little faster than 7 but once in a while it hangs up on me
It has the useful features of Firefox, like a favorite bar. And if it crashed it only takes 10 seconds to restart it and the last browsing session. I use Firefox for DU, for some reason EI8 wont let me post on DU.

I'm also the few here who likes Vista. It hasent givin me any major trouble at all. Its runs ok on my 4 month old $700 HP laptop. But the gaming computer is a different story, it fly's!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyclimber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
27. I hope so.
And I hope they give everyone who had to suffer through this Vista hell a replacement something or other. Preferably a Mac (my desktop computer's a first-generation iMac).

I really didn't mind NT 4.0 too much, but every other GUI-based OS MS has put out has been a piece of crap. Even the Win95 beta wasn't as awful as Vista.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
29. WILL NOT get Windows Seven until SP 1 comes out without a hitch
by then maybe MAC will wise up about games... and then we can kiss MS goodbye...

I already have...postiing from a lappie running xandros... and at home I use a MAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
31. I'm using the Beta 1 of Windows 7 now....
and it's nothing short of incredible. Faster, smaller, much easier to install. They did it right with Win7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. I have beta 1 where do you get smaller from? It uses up 3 gigs of disk space, and that's just...
the Windows folder. Granted its a slight improvement to Windows Vista, but only slight. I simply don't understand why it uses up that much disk space for an OS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. I meant the MEMORY FOOTPRINT.. about 60% the size of Vista.. and...
Vista64 took up 11gb on my HD, Win7/64 took up 4.5... that's more than 'slight'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. However, its also a beta version, and isn't fully functional yet...
who knows how many extras are going to be on the Retail version.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. THREE GIGS????????????
What the hell did they pack in there?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. I have no clue, like I said that's just the Windows Folder, didn't include Program Files...
and even the basest install of any Windows OS includes a bunch of things installed into Program Files.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #31
51. Yeah, I pulled it off MSDN and set up a VM.
I haven't done much with it to try and make it crash yet, but so far it seems to be fast and small. It's much faster than my Vista VM, but since it's a VM YMMV. I AM a bit irked that they killed the classic taskbar though...I always preferred the classic bar to the new Aero taskbar. I do like the fact that it doesn't bug you with that stupid UAC alert all the time like Vista.

We'll see how the final works out, but it's looking like Windows 7 is really just Vista 1.5...which should have been Vista 1.0. No complaints yet, but the day is young.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #31
63. Is it stable enough to use as your main OS? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
32. Just call it Mojave and maybe people won't notice.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
35. OFFICIAL: Open Beta for Windows 7 THIS WEEK, read how to get it here
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9125380

FAQ: How to get the Windows 7 beta
Microsoft this week is putting the new OS in everyone's hands

January 8, 2009 (Computerworld) Late yesterday, Microsoft unveiled the public beta for Windows 7, the follow-on and follow-up to Vista, which from all signs the company is trying to forget as fast as possible. CEO Steve Ballmer, in a surprisingly subdued keynote -- no real shouting -- made the announcement last night at the International CES. It wasn't much of a surprise, what with leaks to file-sharing sites and hints posted on Microsoft's own site in recent weeks. Still, it's a new version of Windows, even if some have dubbed it "Vista, a lot better." Oh, wait, that was Ballmer himself, back in October. And because it's fresh and shiny, there are plenty of people eager to try it out, wanting to decide for themselves whether Microsoft has hit a home run this time or just smacked another Vista. But where can you get it, how do you install it and what do you need to patch after you have it on your PC?

Questions, everyone has questions. We have some of the answers.

When can I download the beta? Starting Friday, Jan. 9. Microsoft said today that it will open the download gates worldwide at noon, Pacific time, tomorrow.

If you subscribe to Microsoft Developer Network (MSDN) or TechNet, you can grab it today from here.

Where do I get it? The public download will be posted to the Windows 7site here http://www.microsoft.com/windows7 , Microsoft said. The beta will also be posted to Microsoft's IT-oriented Springboard Series site, which will add a "Windows 7" tab to the existing Windows XP and Windows Vista tabs already there.

read more at the link...


also a good review of beta 1 here http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=Operating+Systems&articleId=9125179&taxonomyId=89&pageNumber=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Please post how to avoid it at all costs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. I suggest you try it and do some reading before you shoot off knowing nothign about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. no thank you. Successfully extracted myself from MS products about 8 years ago
Edited on Thu Jan-08-09 06:32 PM by burythehatchet
very happily settled and don't really miss anything about it. Thanks for asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. Readying the review you linked to...unimpressed
strip three seconds from MP3 tracks....

I know it is a beta but still...who the hell are they kidding?

Oh never mind me

THEY KNOW that if they don't get it right the enterprise environment will laugh them out of the top...

So this is partly PR...sleek PR, but PR nonetheless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #36
56. Easy - just stay on DU and grumble about MS
I, on the other hand, will likely upgrade. Since the 1980s, my experience with MS operating systems is that every second release is an extended beta for the one afterwards. So while I have Vista on a laptop here (and it's nowhere near as bad as some suggest IF it is configured right), Windows 7 looks like the new hotness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Systematic Chaos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
52. I'm one happy s.o.b. to have completely avoided Vista up until now.
I intend to continue avoiding it as long as possible.

I'm on an iMac, and I have Boot Camp running XP SP3. I spend about half my time in each os right now, and would gladly give up XP for good if the games I play would work in Leopard. Alas, they don't so I'm stuck with XP but honestly I've been quite happy with it and have never encountered the nightmares that Vista adopters have been plagued with.

I did tech support for Logitech around the time that Vista was released. It was so funny because our computers we worked on had just barely been upgraded from Windows 2000 to XP. I hate to admit it, but we really were flying blind when it came to helping customers maneuver around the interface, and relied mostly upon screen shots and diagrams and drawings which we developed as time and creativity allowed. Hell, we couldn't even guide the Vista users into the registry to re-enumerate their USB devices, which we could do in every previous OS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sultana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
62. Macs Rule!
:evilgrin:

that's all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
66. IIRC, I think I heard that this is actually a new version of Vista, but
they're not calling it Vista because Vista is known for all its problems, causing a lot of folks to want nothing to do with it. (Note that I said IIRC, and I'm really not sure if I'm remembering correctly--though I wouldn't put anything past Microsoft.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
69. I resent buying a "faster" computer and it not being faster
and the reason is Vista is such a memory drain. Make the operating system faster and crash less! That's what people want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #69
75. Oh, if only people had any idea just how awesome their new hardware really was.
Vista could bring a Cray to it's knees.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
70. Because of Vista - my next computer will be a MAC
MACs have all the software that PCs do and the updates/viruses/system slowdowns are not worth the trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
74. RIP, Vista
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC