Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which is the better word to use right now? Prosecute or Investigate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:51 PM
Original message
Which is the better word to use right now? Prosecute or Investigate?
I am of a mind that we just go straight to sentencing, but that's just me.

The talkers in the media are speaking of Democrats "prosecuting" the former administration.

Maybe that term is too incendiary.

To say we are going to prosecute presumes we have sufficient evidence to go to trial. I suspect we do not - even though we KNOW they're guilty.

So maybe we ought to be saying we plan to investigate.

What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Call for a Special Prosecutor.
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 05:53 PM by tekisui
ETA: They can investigate while the Dems take a hand's off approac h until they bring a case with a sure conviction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:17 PM
Original message
Why a special prosecutor?
Why not let the Justice Department do what they're supposed to do - uphold federal law? The SP, it seems to me, just makes a circus of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'll be happy with either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Investigate, then prosecute. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Investigate....
Presumably, that would lead to prosecutions.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. In the name of all that's holy, PROSECUTE
Investigation will take all of five minutes, thanks to "the Google" and those whistleblowers who have already stepped forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_Horrible Donating Member (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. my vote is for imprision... go straight to jail do not collect $200
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Investigate what? Most of us have Bush and Cheney admitting to torture TiVo'd.
Investigate, my granny.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Execute. Ooops!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jkid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Prosecute him and get it over with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Welcome to DU
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Frame as invistigate so that we can actually get control of the DoJ
and then commence to prosecuting. Sneer and Smirk removed any path to "overlooking" the crimes because they are apparently so very proud of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Persecute and immolate are my preferred terms. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Immolate ... I like that
Allow me ....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. Investigate first
if evidence is found, then prosecute to the fullest extent of the law. Then convict and send them to a maximum security prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. investigate and if warranted, prosecute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. PROSECUTE
The pugs were not afraid of words when they went after Clinton for lying about a BJ. Why are Dems so timid? Phrased and presented correctly, Americans will accept the word PROSECUTE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. I believe it begins with hearings first then the investigation...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Why do we need hearings?
Carjackers and kidnappers and civil rights violators (all federal crimes) don't get hearings. What got done by bushco is simple federal law violations. Prosecute them as common criminals. EVERYTHING we need to do that is in place .... except maybe the will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. Investigate and then prosecute
The nasty details have to come out -- as many as we can possibly force the 'murikan public to hear/see. As much as I'd love to have all of them behind bars for war crimes, more than anything I want people to see the reality of what the Jack Bauer mentality leads to.

We know darned well that if they admit to waterboarding they MUST be doing other, worse things. If Sy Hersch is right about the screams of boys being sodomized, I want the pro-torture folks to have to listen to them.

Once we have all the evidence, then give them trials as public as OJ's. Only then should we lock 'em up and throw away the key.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caliman73 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. They would be technically correct in using "Prosecute"
I think that it incendiary. Prosecute technically means to instigate legal proceedings against someone or to find something out by means of legal process. An investigation would be the beginning of the prosecution of the legal process. However, most of us understand it to be that they will be automatically hauled in front of a judge and tried.

So, yes they are using it in a technically correct way, but the media always chooses words that will incite viewers and draw ratings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. Investigate is a fine word -- even a Special Investigator.
The issue is that when sufficient evidence of wrongdoing is in hand, there must be a commitment to prosecute.

Of course, the RW is going to call any investigation a "witch hunt." The word "investigate" will not deter them. But it might matter to public opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. Investigate first then if there is a crime, try the guilty and then prosecute.
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 06:59 PM by nc4bo
MUST prosecute. MUST prosecute. MUST prosecute. To the fullest extent of the law.

Investigations alone are worthless and a joke when no action is taken if there are findings of wrongdoing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
23. Prosecute, we have eight years of evidence against them.
We already have plenty to prosecute on, no need to drag things out any longer. They can still continue to investigate for additional charges, but they need to arrest these people on the charges that we already have substantial evidence on now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
24. Why waste time on further investigation when crimes have already been enumerated
in the Articles of Impeachment presented by Kucinich? PROSECUTE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Those were articles of impeachment. Prosecution happens in courts, not congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
26. Investigate absolutely - prosecution only occurs based on an investigation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
27. If you see a crime and it is recorded, not much investigation is needed.
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 07:48 PM by mmonk
So it's pretty much up to trial or no enforcement of the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC