Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC to tread lightly with D.C. madam story - only two officials will be named

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:10 AM
Original message
ABC to tread lightly with D.C. madam story - only two officials will be named

http://www.examiner.com/a-708208~Yeas___Nays__Thursday__May_3.html

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - ABC to tread lightly with D.C. madam

Washingtonians eagerly — and, some nervously — await Friday night’s “20/20” special on ABC, when reporter Brian Ross and his investigative team present what they’ve unearthed about Deborah Jeane Palfrey (aka the “D.C. Madam”) and her clients.

But the show is likely to disappoint viewers eager to see a roster of VIPs who patronized Palfrey’s escort service. Yeas & Nays hears that, as of this writing, the segment will reveal only two new names and is currently slotted for a mere seven minutes at the end of the hour long broadcast (you’ll recall that Palfrey turned over nearly 15,000 phone numbers to ABC News back in March).

Interviews with both Palfrey and former Deputy Secretary of state Randall Tobias (who left the State Department last week after being interviewed by ABC News for the “20/20” piece) are currently scheduled, leaving precious little time remaining for much else (or for all of those salacious details you’ve been waiting for).

Sources tell Yeas & Nays that Ross, who had anticipated a far juicier piece, is none too happy with the final results, especially after he and the network promoted this story for weeks. It’s worth remembering that Ross and his team have a big-story reputation: They are the ones who helped bring down former Rep. Mark Foley because of his sexually explicit contacts with congressional pages.

“This isn’t going to blow the lid off Washington,” says one ABC employee who asked not to be named. “If they had any big fish, we’d know it by now. There’s no way this lives up to the hype.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. What do you want to bet that this scandal goes right to The White House? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. This proves that there are only Rape-Publicans on the list.
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Or, that it's mostly a bunch of private citizens that the general publice would be "who"?
What's stopping the madam from naming names if ABC won't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. No, they said they had a juicier version of the story...
but I'm betting someone put the kaibosh on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Dupe
Edited on Thu May-03-07 09:23 AM by Mike Daniels
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthboundmisfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. So were any Pamela Martin girls involved
in the poker parties at the Watergate, I wonder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. NO surprise there
I'm not sure why the D.C. Madam thought ABC would expose the congressional members using her service. They've been complicit through silence on every other crime our government has committed, why would it be any different this time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. THEN HAND THE LIST OVER TO SOME ACTUAL REPORTERS
GODDAMN I AM SICK OF THE LAPDOG PRESS COVERING UP FOR THESE CREEPS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. I am betting that the Govt tel wiretaps of ABC News paid some dividends here...
ABC News probably got letters threatening their license if they named certain top officials, and there might have been some allusions to possible 'wrongdoing' by ABC News officials if this story went forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Ding ding ding!! We have a winner!
Blackmail almost always pays off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. Foley ... who has yet to answer for preying on teens ...
... I really hope this mo-fo blows up but I'm suspecting its going to limp away quietly, just like all the other GOP scandals that should have had them run out of town on a rail. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. Calling Larry FLYNT!!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
12. Tread lightly unless they can find a few Democrats on the list.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. They'll name one Democrat (first) and then one Republicon
They'll name one Democrat (first) and then one Republicon,
"proving" that it's a bipartisan scandal.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Agreed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. Did anyone really think the corporate media would do anything
that might threaten the far right? Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DKRC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Nope. If she'd wanted to hold their feet to the fire
she would've handed the records over to real reporters not to one of W's lapdogs.
I would LOVE to see Greg Palast get hold of those records!
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
17. Bill Clinton must not be on the list
or maybe he's one of the two. LOL If this were Clinton, Gary Hart, etc., this would be the biggest story on every network for months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
18. Well, I guess that this proves the majority are Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC