|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
sabra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:10 AM Original message |
ABC to tread lightly with D.C. madam story - only two officials will be named |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:13 AM Response to Original message |
1. What do you want to bet that this scandal goes right to The White House? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:13 AM Response to Original message |
2. This proves that there are only Rape-Publicans on the list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike Daniels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:21 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Or, that it's mostly a bunch of private citizens that the general publice would be "who"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 10:22 AM Response to Reply #6 |
16. No, they said they had a juicier version of the story... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike Daniels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:22 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthboundmisfit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
3. So were any Pamela Martin girls involved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oilwellian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
4. NO surprise there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
5. THEN HAND THE LIST OVER TO SOME ACTUAL REPORTERS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
8. I am betting that the Govt tel wiretaps of ABC News paid some dividends here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:28 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Ding ding ding!! We have a winner! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hippiechick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
10. Foley ... who has yet to answer for preying on teens ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
11. Calling Larry FLYNT!!1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
12. Tread lightly unless they can find a few Democrats on the list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 10:06 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. They'll name one Democrat (first) and then one Republicon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 10:34 AM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Agreed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
14. Did anyone really think the corporate media would do anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DKRC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Nope. If she'd wanted to hold their feet to the fire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
17. Bill Clinton must not be on the list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
18. Well, I guess that this proves the majority are Republicans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC