Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mitch Landrieu predicts ugly fight for resources to contain oil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 05:35 PM
Original message
Mitch Landrieu predicts ugly fight for resources to contain oil
With oil from BP's gushing well in the Gulf of Mexico creeping toward Mississippi, Alabama and Florida, New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu said Thursday that he expects tensions to rise as local officials vie for limited resources to protect their fragile coastlines.

"It's going to be a very uncomfortable discussion that's going to be held over the next couple of months, should they not be able to cap this well, which is why capping the well is the most critical and important thing," he said.

Landrieu said the federal command structure - with Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen charged with parceling out absorbent boom, skimmers and other resources - bears a marked contrast with chaotic efforts after Hurricane Katrina to secure federal aid.

"But that doesn't take away the hard fact that people are going to get and some people are not going to get, and so you see this now with the governors of Alabama, Mississippi and Florida wanting to protect their constituents saying, 'I need the limited resources,'" Landrieu said.

Decrying BP's failure so far to quell the flow of oil and the government's shortage of materials to contain it, Landrieu said the hard lessons of Katrina have not been heeded.

"The bigger question is: Why do we have limited resources?" he said. "Is this nation really capable of doing big things? We're seeing once again that there are some catastrophic events that we are not, as a nation, fully prepared (for), or as a private industry.

"This is not a surprise to us in Louisiana," the mayor said. "We told people after Katrina and Rita that we are the canary in the coal mine and that there are some things that you have to do better. And obviously now we have another catastrophic event that BP was not prepared for. We're very frustrated and angry about it."
<snip>
http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/06/mitch_landrieu_predicts_ugly_f.html

Why do they have limited resources??

Why isn't BP scouring the Earth and buying anything that isn't available in the US if it's needed?? Why isn't the government??

Why??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. No Government States - like gulf states
won't pay the taxes for government to be prepared. They insist corporations can do the job better.

And then when, time after time, corporations don't, they blame the government - no wait, they blame the most convenient Democrat. Blanco after Katrina and Obama now.

And the worst part is that Democrats like Landrieu won't acknowledge his or his sister's political complicity in the mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So, the govenment should just stay out of it?
They shouldn't make sure that the corporations do have the material on hand?? They should just wait until there is a disaster like this and then check??

Were any of them, BP and the government, looking for ways and places too obtain enough supplies after it was apparent that the oil gusher was huge?? Did they just hope the fixes would work??

This will screw all of us in some way. The Gulf feels the immediate and most severe pain, but the entire country is going to be paying for this for a long, long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not remotely what I said
The complete opposite of what I said. I won't explain it because people have got to quit reading their own agenda into other people's words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC