Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JHB

JHB's Journal
JHB's Journal
July 16, 2024

"Simplifying" the tax code by cutting brackets has always been a lie and a swindle

The Trump/Heritage Foundation Project 2025 is a wish list of Conservative/Right-Wing hobby horses, one of them being "simplifying" the tax code by cutting the number of brackets down to two: 15% and 30%.

This is a repeat of the tax cuts in Reagan's 2nd term, with the brackets then being 15% and 28%, with the dividing line being roughly at the median income at the time (in effect 1988-1990). All it got us was a ballooning deficit and the last gasp of actual Republican fiscal responsibility when GHW Bush went back on his "read my lips, no new taxes" pledge and signed a feeble improvement by adding one -- count 'em, ONE -- additional bracket at the high end. Bill Clinton signed a reform adding two more. It was still inadequate and didn't go anywhere near really high incomes, but it proved doomsaying Republicans wrong by putting us into budgetary surplus.

The argument for "simplifying" the tax code by cutting brackets was always a lie. All the complicated parts (what's deductible, what type of income is this, can I take these credits, etc.) come before calculating the bill. Calculating what is owed is just math, no matter the number of brackets. It can be tedious, but it's already simple. And that was before these little things called "computers" that, y'know, compute numbers fast.

The highest number of brackets we had was more than a hundred years ago (1919-1921) when there were 56. Let me repeat that: FIFTY-SIX! Fifty six in an age of paper calculations and mechanical adding machines. Today we can make tee shirts with enough computing power to handle the bracket math.

Through most of the post-WW2 era, there were 24. It's been over 10 years since I did some adjusting for inflation, but to take good old 1955 as an example, two-thirds only affected taxable income above the equivalent of $250,000 (in 2013 dollars). Eleven of those only affected taxable income above the equivalent of half a million dollars. The top bracket affected taxable income over the equivalent of a little under $4 million.

It is now and always has been about cutting taxes for the top and sticking everyone else with the bills.

Related discussion: Trump's Project 2025 will bring large middle class tax increase
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219165937

July 12, 2024

ProLeft Podcast Ep 819 Ridin' With Biden!


Jul 12, 2024 The Professional Left with Driftglass and BlueGal
We're so stabby about the mainstream media right now, it's a swear-fest. Fran is boycotting MSNBC for the Summer to protect her mental health and punish the suits upstairs (Sorry, Lawrence.). And Driftglass remembers the 60th anniversary of Freedom Summer, when Black Mississippians had to fight the Democratic establishment to become the Democratic base. More at proleftpod.com.
----------------

JHB: An unequivocally Pro-Biden perspective from the cornfields of the heartland.
May 19, 2024

"Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Body" Sorry I had to.... 😂

Found this little ditty on Twitter (not calling it that other name). Apologies to those who can't see it, but I can't find it in another format.

https://twitter.com/Tn_Brando/status/1791928487055405373

He has a YouTube channel, but the song isn't on it (yet).
https://www.youtube.com/@TennesseeBrando

February 3, 2024

Photo



(Don't ask how I managed to do that. It involved "View page source" and scrolling down through a lot of page code until I saw something and thought "would that work?" I'm not sure I could repeat it)

Profile Information

Gender: Do not display
Current location: Somewhere in the NYC metropolitan statistical area
Member since: 2001
Number of posts: 37,194
Latest Discussions»JHB's Journal