Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
ancianita
ancianita's Journal
ancianita's Journal
December 5, 2022
https://soundcloud.com/techdirt/scrutinizing-the-twitter-files
Ever heard of "The Twitter Files" about Hunter Biden? Me, neither.
More nothing burger anti-govt hype and this fog of war stuff is all the right can do.
From Techdirt:
https://www.techdirt.com/2022/12/05/techdirt-podcast-episode-338-scrutinizing-the-twitter-files/?fbclid=IwAR3qCca5pTPlijd9EBHcAVsGzrPdnKXNucPsViukKJD5iMoQx7zEAzoDHkc
Last Friday evening, Elon Musk and Matt Taibbi dropped a non-bombshell on everyone, with the revelation of internal Twitter documents about the content moderation around Hunter Bidens laptop that showed
nothing particularly unusual or notable happened, and theres no evidence of government interference.
Over the weekend, Mike was interviewed by Justin Hendrix for the Tech Policy Press podcast for a closer look at just what was contained in the Twitter Files, and weve got the whole conversation for you here on this weeks episode.
Over the weekend, Mike was interviewed by Justin Hendrix for the Tech Policy Press podcast for a closer look at just what was contained in the Twitter Files, and weve got the whole conversation for you here on this weeks episode.
https://soundcloud.com/techdirt/scrutinizing-the-twitter-files
December 5, 2022
https://www.techdirt.com/2022/09/22/klobuchars-link-tax-is-back-and-somehow-even-worse-helps-trumpist-grifters-get-free-money-no-moderation-from-google/
Not good, Senator. Please think this thing through some more.
From Techdirt -- Amy Klobuchar and the JCPA -- WTF? Has anyone even heard of this?
https://www.techdirt.com/2022/12/05/is-it-possible-to-get-fair-coverage-of-the-link-tax-bill-when-the-news-orgs-covering-it-are-the-main-beneficiaries/?fbclid=IwAR1IddgHQygnf20hI-cBVHB09LpI5XkdjEuqNhgt_ybSpRljAxUqY0uisvEWeve been covering the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act (JCPA), which is a blatant handout by Congress in the form of a link tax that would require internet companies pay news orgs (mainly the vulture capitalist orgs that have been buying up local newspapers around the country, firing most of the journalists and living off of the legacy revenue streams) for
daring to send them traffic.
Weve gone over all the ways the bill is bad. [See the link below]
Weve gone over the fact that people in both the House and the Senate are (at this very moment) looking for ways to sneak it into law when no ones looking. Indeed, there are reports that there will be an announcement tonight that its included as a part of the National Defense Appropriations Act (NDAA).
The whole thing stinks of corruption. Politicians often rely on local newspapers for endorsements to win re-election campaigns, so they want to keep local papers happy. And its the perfect kind of corrupt handout for Congress. Its not even using taxpayer funds. Its forcing other companies the hated internet companies to foot the bill.
And, heres the thing: the newspapers themselves are now stumping for the bill.
Weve gone over all the ways the bill is bad. [See the link below]
Weve gone over the fact that people in both the House and the Senate are (at this very moment) looking for ways to sneak it into law when no ones looking. Indeed, there are reports that there will be an announcement tonight that its included as a part of the National Defense Appropriations Act (NDAA).
The whole thing stinks of corruption. Politicians often rely on local newspapers for endorsements to win re-election campaigns, so they want to keep local papers happy. And its the perfect kind of corrupt handout for Congress. Its not even using taxpayer funds. Its forcing other companies the hated internet companies to foot the bill.
And, heres the thing: the newspapers themselves are now stumping for the bill.
https://www.techdirt.com/2022/09/22/klobuchars-link-tax-is-back-and-somehow-even-worse-helps-trumpist-grifters-get-free-money-no-moderation-from-google/
.. This whole scheme was dreamed up by Rupert Murdoch, who after decades of pretending to be about free markets, started demanding the government force internet companies to subsidize him for his own failures to innovate.
The nature of the JCPA (Journalism Competition and Preservation Act) is that it allows news organizations to band together into a cartel to negotiate with big internet companies to force them to pay for access where access really means linking to us and sending us the traffic we crave, and already use search engine optimization tactics to try to increase.
If the big internet companies dont agree to pay for this thing that does not require payment (on the internet, linking is and must remain fundamentally free), then the cartel can submit an amount they think they should get paid to an arbitrator. The internet company can submit their own alternative, but the arbitrator has to chose, baseball-style, between one of the two submissions, and cant pick anything else.
Two weeks ago there was a markup in which Klobuchar seemed to think she had a deal to push the bill out of committee and onto the floor (despite no real hearings addressing the many, many issues with the bill). However, Ted Cruz blew up the bill by attaching an amendment about content moderation.
Apparently, Klobuchar and Cruz spent the last two weeks negotiating, and now the bill is back up for markup after they came to an agreement that appears to give Cruz and Trumpist grifter disinfo peddlers exactly what they want. As pointed out by Adam Kovacevich, the new language in the managers amendment says that in the negotiation internet companies basically cant even raise content moderation issues.
Again, this gives much more power to Trumpist grifter sites who can band together, demand free cash from Google, and Google is prohibited from saying anything about content moderation issues.
Its a weird thing for Klobuchar to be on board with, but shes made it clear in this and other bills that she has no problem helping out Trumpist websites if it means attacking Google and/or the open internet.
... the Daily Caller, one of many Trumpist grifter sites is already celebrating how the deal protects conservative media.
When Tucker Carlsons publication is cheering on a Democrats bill for how it will protect conservative media, a sensible Democrat might reconsider what theyve done.
But not Amy Klobuchar! If its bad for Google, who cares if it helps out Breitbart and the Daily Caller to spread more nonsense. Great work, Senator...."
The nature of the JCPA (Journalism Competition and Preservation Act) is that it allows news organizations to band together into a cartel to negotiate with big internet companies to force them to pay for access where access really means linking to us and sending us the traffic we crave, and already use search engine optimization tactics to try to increase.
If the big internet companies dont agree to pay for this thing that does not require payment (on the internet, linking is and must remain fundamentally free), then the cartel can submit an amount they think they should get paid to an arbitrator. The internet company can submit their own alternative, but the arbitrator has to chose, baseball-style, between one of the two submissions, and cant pick anything else.
Two weeks ago there was a markup in which Klobuchar seemed to think she had a deal to push the bill out of committee and onto the floor (despite no real hearings addressing the many, many issues with the bill). However, Ted Cruz blew up the bill by attaching an amendment about content moderation.
Apparently, Klobuchar and Cruz spent the last two weeks negotiating, and now the bill is back up for markup after they came to an agreement that appears to give Cruz and Trumpist grifter disinfo peddlers exactly what they want. As pointed out by Adam Kovacevich, the new language in the managers amendment says that in the negotiation internet companies basically cant even raise content moderation issues.
Again, this gives much more power to Trumpist grifter sites who can band together, demand free cash from Google, and Google is prohibited from saying anything about content moderation issues.
Its a weird thing for Klobuchar to be on board with, but shes made it clear in this and other bills that she has no problem helping out Trumpist websites if it means attacking Google and/or the open internet.
... the Daily Caller, one of many Trumpist grifter sites is already celebrating how the deal protects conservative media.
When Tucker Carlsons publication is cheering on a Democrats bill for how it will protect conservative media, a sensible Democrat might reconsider what theyve done.
But not Amy Klobuchar! If its bad for Google, who cares if it helps out Breitbart and the Daily Caller to spread more nonsense. Great work, Senator...."
Not good, Senator. Please think this thing through some more.
Profile Information
Gender: Do not displayHometown: New England, The South, Midwest
Home country: USA
Current location: Sarasota
Member since: Sat Mar 5, 2011, 12:32 PM
Number of posts: 36,132