Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 02:20 PM Sep 2019

Whistle blower atty. Mark S. Zaid responds: "Publishing details about the whistleblower will only [View all]

Whistle blower atty. Mark S. Zaid responds: "Publishing details about the whistleblower will only lead to identification of someone, whether our client or the wrong person, as the whistleblower. This will place this individual in a much more dangerous situation




The NYT is reckless here. WTF were they thinking? They published the article after the president threatened the wb.
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dreadful editorial decision on the part of the NYT. Pacifist Patriot Sep 2019 #1
And we have Russian bdamomma Sep 2019 #13
One is sitting in.... SergeStorms Sep 2019 #18
Bwahahaha! Ligyron Sep 2019 #25
Well bdamomma Sep 2019 #36
Thank you Melissa! Seriously - journalists are so interested in profit and fame IndyOp Sep 2019 #2
Hold on a second PJMcK Sep 2019 #30
THANKS! jayschool2013 Sep 2019 #32
Journalists make judgement calls IndyOp Sep 2019 #33
The way the amoral pig is talking he would love to know who it is... Thomas Hurt Sep 2019 #3
Not good. MelissaB Sep 2019 #4
Thank you, Melissa - I had just checked his and Bakaj's tweets for a statement, found nothing- Leghorn21 Sep 2019 #5
I agree! peggysue2 Sep 2019 #6
Shame on the NYT. StarryNite Sep 2019 #7
The NYT has a lot of blood on its hands already BannonsLiver Sep 2019 #10
Disagree... brooklynite Sep 2019 #8
I'd bet they could as well, but the Times just pointed right to him/her saving them a LOT of time. MelissaB Sep 2019 #14
It's not the WH (be sure they know who it is), it is the deplorables to watch out for: Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2019 #23
I don't think a CIA agent needs to worry about some good ol' boys from Alabama. brooklynite Sep 2019 #24
NYT working hard at throwing monkey wrenches into the process BannonsLiver Sep 2019 #9
Trump just referred that the Whistle-blower BillE Sep 2019 #11
From the Hoarse Whisperer Gothmog Sep 2019 #12
NYT obviously not a favorite with DU stopdiggin Sep 2019 #15
Exactly! nt tblue37 Sep 2019 #16
Especially after tRump has publicly threatened present and future witnesses and whistleblowers. . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2019 #17
Hey, NYT: STFU! Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2019 #19
Witness protection should be an after-thought at this moment. We're talking powerful mobsters ffr Sep 2019 #20
Christopher Steele disappeared for a while after his identity released...he knew how wiggs Sep 2019 #21
NY Times turned right wing some time ago ArcticFox Sep 2019 #22
considering the kind of stuff that the REAL right wing is publishing these days .. stopdiggin Sep 2019 #28
I would caution you ArcticFox Sep 2019 #34
I think this person's identity... Mike Nelson Sep 2019 #26
Maybe trump is the one who will or have someone leak it to the press and use it to threaten them, duforsure Sep 2019 #27
WTF NYT, we aren't going to tolerate this complicity anymore. Pepsidog Sep 2019 #29
Man, I'm so slow - just remembered that Pompeo was CIA Director from Jan. 2017 until April 2018. Leghorn21 Sep 2019 #31
Jesus! If they had his home address would they publish that too? flibbitygiblets Sep 2019 #35
"Whether our client or the WRONG person" ecstatic Sep 2019 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Whistle blower atty. Mark...