Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Mike 03

(18,554 posts)

5. So now I'm wondering if it is not true, as was widely reported, that

Reply to steve2470 (Original post)

Tue Oct 1, 2019, 04:03 PM

Oct 2019

the Mercers, who own or manage Breitbart, had a huge falling-out with Trump and no longer want anything to do with him and don't support him. Looking at Breitbart today, which I haven't done in years, is still really painful because as far as I can see they are totally and completely all in for Trump (to a degree that is embarrassing).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

RUMOUR: Breitbart to release whistleblower name [View all] steve2470 Oct 2019 OP

If they release any name be it the WB or not Iliyah Oct 2019 #1

I am sure she meant "Breitbart" :) nt steve2470 Oct 2019 #2

Nah, Breitbat sums it up. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2019 #4

Can that be construed as witness intimidation? zooks Oct 2019 #3

So now I'm wondering if it is not true, as was widely reported, that Mike 03 Oct 2019 #5

Probably thought they'd get it from Jacob Wohl and that Burkman ass Roland99 Oct 2019 #6

Insiders already know who it is, so this just allows the violent lindysalsagal Oct 2019 #7