Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Moostache

(10,682 posts)
4. Charlie, is it?
Wed May 5, 2021, 01:03 PM
May 2021

Well, Chuckie, here's the thing - the First Amendment protection of free speech applies ONLY to the government and its ability to pass laws that limit speech, establish a state religion, etc., etc. Individual citizens can do and say pretty much whatever they damn well want, though they are NOT protected from the consequences of those actions and decisions. They may be as vile and hateful as the communities they reside in will abide, but they generally find that they run afoul of things like access providers who will NOT abide their bile.

The thing that infected the Oval Office is no different. His right to say whatever dumb shit he wants is NOT violated here, but his access to other people's infrastructure and systems to make it easy for him IS NOT A RIGHT.

I thought the GQP was for free-dumb and business-directed polices - guess that is another 'right' reserved for old white men, huh?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GQP response to FB ban of...»Reply #4