Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Will the four subpoenaed witnesses "take the 5th"? [View all]Tadpole Raisin
(1,789 posts)14. If Ds are serious and they don't show up or claim executive privileges
well theres always the Sergeant at Arms. Rs know that in the past there were no consequences. Lets change that.
And if they plead the fifth as is their right but Ds have strong evidence of criminality dont mess around and forward this to DOJ for criminal prosecution. No negotiable, no dragging things out past the midterms so Rs can squash it if they regain control.
Dont know if it would do anything but after the faux outrage some would realize this isnt a game anymore and maybe would cooperate. If not they can spend the next 10-20 years paying off their lawyer.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

That would be interesting since he has the strongest claim of the four for executive privilege
StarfishSaver
Sep 2021
#60
Democrats are like the Colonial soldiers against the Americans in the Revolutionary war.
johnthewoodworker
Sep 2021
#11
Exactly which "antiquated laws" are Dems fighting with, which ones do you think should they ignore
StarfishSaver
Sep 2021
#27
If they don't show up, there's no need for the Sergeant-at-Arms to get involved
StarfishSaver
Sep 2021
#19
Thanks. Though rarely done I thought the Sergeant At Arms could arrest and detain people who
Tadpole Raisin
Sep 2021
#29
Trying to use the Sergeant-at-Arms to arrest people is very complicated and probably won't ever work
StarfishSaver
Sep 2021
#48
If they defy the subpoena and don't have valid grounds (executive privilege or 5th Amendment)
StarfishSaver
Sep 2021
#20
That's my fear; that this will end up in court and take a year or two to process.
Midnight Writer
Sep 2021
#32
I understand. But in reality, the courts have moved very quickly and fairly in most of these cases
StarfishSaver
Sep 2021
#39
This seems like it would be a very high profile and "politically prickly" case...?
kentuck
Sep 2021
#42
That's why I said that it's possible that the US attorney would seek Garland's approval
StarfishSaver
Sep 2021
#44
I don't see him ever getting publicly involved in a contempt of Congress prosecution
StarfishSaver
Sep 2021
#50
If he refused without exerting a privilege, yes, that would be a big deal
StarfishSaver
Sep 2021
#59
I say a little rendition trip to a black site in the mideast and a little waterboarding
Hotler
Sep 2021
#46
Is the committee issues a contempt of Congress citation, the U.S. Attorney will no doubt enforce
StarfishSaver
Sep 2021
#53