Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ok would you people PLEASE get your election shit together [View all]grantcart
(53,061 posts)40. The reality is that the US is not a homogeneous population
united into a single Republic, it is an entire continent equivalent land mass that incorporates 50 written constitutions and 50 Courts into a federated constitution with an additional court.
The equivalent comparison would be with the European Union or ASEAN, or all S America or either half of Africa.
In order to achieve that, which no other largely populated geographically dispersed state has achieved for a single century let alone starting on our third.
The answer requires a union of highly autonomous jurisdictions (states) that give people local control while being held accountable to a federal constitution which establishes basic principles.
Also given that we have elections at a much higher frequency than any other democracy it means that differing populations have different preferences how to do that. Some want all mail in ballots some want a mix.
I fall to see why any of that should be the least bit objectionable to any one if it creates more avenues for more people to vote.
The "get your shit together" isn't my words but using the OPs offensive phrase on him because he is advocating imposing a single system of non mail in person voting on a country of 330 million.
I could suggest that if Canada added mail more rural and native voters could participate but I don't because a) I have no idea if that is true b) it is none of my business.
The issue of the electoral college has nothing to do with the patronizing and rather uniformed dribble of the OP.. The electoral college was the compromise necessary to obtain small states to agree to a more centralized federal government after the failure of the Articles of Federation.
There are many more objections to his suggestion of no mail in voting not the least of which is the disenfranchisement of millions of US military that are not resident in their voting jurisdiction, 3 million citizens living overseas (but unlike other countries still obligated to pay taxes) millions that are traveling. I would also add the informed but I assume that Canada has a mechanism for that.
All of this complaint from the OP for what reason? It takes a week to get complete results. What is the fucking rush? It's more important to get more people involved in a transparent process than to have it done by some artificial deadline.
And by the way the OPs final sentence is patently false
It's coming up on a week . . . don't have results for House OR Senate?
We have 99% of the results in. Anybody in the world who loves Democracy should be rejoicing on the results of this election, it's rejection of election deniers, it's reversal of traditional off year trends, the non violence, increased youth and minority participation and it's rejection of America firsterism. Complaining about how long it takes to get such results is pretty small grapes.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I want the fewest barriers to voting, and to have as many legal votes counted as possible.
RockRaven
Nov 2022
#1
Exactly. California should be the example for every state to follow. All registered voters are
JohnSJ
Nov 2022
#2
I really wish we had snap elections, that would mitigate a demented psychopath traitor of President
msfiddlestix
Nov 2022
#32
As long as all the valid ballots are counted properly, it doesn't matter if it takes
Justice matters.
Nov 2022
#3
Again, American exceptionalism. Somehow Brazil, UK, and Canada get new govts running in a few days
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 2022
#14
In Canada, the parliament is "suspended" some 40 days before the vote and...
Justice matters.
Nov 2022
#36
Lame ducks can work the other way too, against Democrats. But re Canada, not quite like you say
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 2022
#39
your voting laws are not at least in part written by those who'd like see slavery return nt
msongs
Nov 2022
#5
It seems you have little interest in learning how to do better. "End of discussion"? Really?
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 2022
#12
You are not Brazil either. It has same population as US roughly and is done in one day
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 2022
#13
US has world's most complicated health system, most complicated elections, and tax system
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 2022
#11
Wealthy U.S. Americans get overly expensive, inappropriate, and potentially deadly health care too.
hunter
Nov 2022
#25
In defense of Americans, their ballots are much longer and may have referendums, etc. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 2022
#15
Anything other than hand marked paper ballots is bullshit with great potential for abuse.
hunter
Nov 2022
#29
You post it every 2 years but Canada only has important federal elections every 4 years.
grantcart
Nov 2022
#23
Well, then, if you have so much electioneering, perhaps you can "get your shit together" as you advi
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 2022
#26
I know it's the Constitution for the Electoral College & lame ducks. It COULD be fixed but isn't
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 2022
#28
We tried getting our shit together. The problem is with Republicans blocking those efforts.
LiberalFighter
Nov 2022
#33
Thank you for your reasoned & well written post. I'll say neither are Canada or Brazil "homogenous"
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 2022
#42