Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)New York Times "full frontal assault" on Biden. They want Trump to win. They have made it very clear. [View all]
Let's accept it.
We're in a war on multiple fronts.
We are in a war against the Nazi pigs in the GOP.
We are at war with much of the mainstream press.
And yes, I know that I will get people defending the Times here, but I don't care.
They are wrong and I am right.
It's been going on for years.
Remember the Bush years and Judith Miller?
Ever read how the New York Times thought Hitler wasn't that bad?
Evan Sutton
@3vanSutton
The @nytimes
full frontal assault on Biden, based on the unverifiable claims of a partisan prosecutor, is one more example of how our elite media is in the tank for Trump. And it was all made inevitable when Merrick Garland handed the GOP this gift on a silver platter.
@3vanSutton
The @nytimes
full frontal assault on Biden, based on the unverifiable claims of a partisan prosecutor, is one more example of how our elite media is in the tank for Trump. And it was all made inevitable when Merrick Garland handed the GOP this gift on a silver platter.
Link to tweet
Greg Sargent
@GregTSargent
Today's NYT talks to experts who say Hur's claims about Biden's memory are hard to verify.
So does that mean NYT regrets yesterday's news analysis hyping those claims?
As I argue below, these analysis pieces are *choices.* There are better ones:
@GregTSargent
Today's NYT talks to experts who say Hur's claims about Biden's memory are hard to verify.
So does that mean NYT regrets yesterday's news analysis hyping those claims?
As I argue below, these analysis pieces are *choices.* There are better ones:
Link to tweet
southpaw
@nycsouthpaw
suited up the whole squad
@nycsouthpaw
suited up the whole squad
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
43 replies, 3447 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (61)
ReplyReply to this post
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New York Times "full frontal assault" on Biden. They want Trump to win. They have made it very clear. [View all]
FelineOverlord
Feb 10
OP
They stopped getting my money a long time ago and they never will get it again!
50 Shades Of Blue
Feb 10
#3
The same paper that manufactured the Hillary email scandal and amplified it throughout the campaign
dalton99a
Feb 10
#5
They're not going to stop. We must go nuclear on the press. It's not just The New York Times.
FelineOverlord
Feb 10
#7
Because they weren't invited to Naomi Biden's wedding, they want to destroy democracy.
FelineOverlord
Feb 10
#13
I take those two with a grain of salt. The NYT has other columnists who are liberal. I read all opinion columns in the
CTyankee
Feb 10
#23
No, just probably older. Seen too much to be really impressed. But I am very worried about lots of things going on...the
CTyankee
Feb 10
#43
The owners of most of the corporate media are .01% ers who would joyfully embrace fascism if it lowered
diane in sf
Feb 10
#21
Good thing most young people don't read the times or watch TV for their information.
diane in sf
Feb 10
#22
They want to remain a neutral party in the war between democracy and authoritarianism.
hay rick
Feb 10
#24
Corporate press is worse than useless, because they're not inert, they're actively inflicting harm.
chia
Feb 10
#25