Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

FelineOverlord

(3,579 posts)
Sat Feb 10, 2024, 12:08 PM Feb 10

New York Times "full frontal assault" on Biden. They want Trump to win. They have made it very clear. [View all]

Let's accept it.

We're in a war on multiple fronts.

We are in a war against the Nazi pigs in the GOP.

We are at war with much of the mainstream press.

And yes, I know that I will get people defending the Times here, but I don't care.

They are wrong and I am right.

It's been going on for years.

Remember the Bush years and Judith Miller?

Ever read how the New York Times thought Hitler wasn't that bad?

Evan Sutton
@3vanSutton
The @nytimes
full frontal assault on Biden, based on the unverifiable claims of a partisan prosecutor, is one more example of how our elite media is in the tank for Trump. And it was all made inevitable when Merrick Garland handed the GOP this gift on a silver platter.






Greg Sargent
@GregTSargent
Today's NYT talks to experts who say Hur's claims about Biden's memory are hard to verify.

So does that mean NYT regrets yesterday's news analysis hyping those claims?

As I argue below, these analysis pieces are *choices.* There are better ones:





southpaw
@nycsouthpaw
suited up the whole squad








43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Peter Baker is pissed Biden won't give the NYT an interview BeyondGeography Feb 10 #1
Exactly FelineOverlord Feb 10 #4
Yep. Their egos are bruised. They dictate the discourse, gosh darn it. shrike3 Feb 10 #11
Peter Baker. Is notorious for his bothsiderisms. As for The NY Times, JohnSJ Feb 10 #12
There's a lot of anger on Twitter FelineOverlord Feb 10 #2
They stopped getting my money a long time ago and they never will get it again! 50 Shades Of Blue Feb 10 #3
The same paper that manufactured the Hillary email scandal and amplified it throughout the campaign dalton99a Feb 10 #5
They all want Trump back. I think they find Biden "boring." FelineOverlord Feb 10 #6
This...this... and always THIS! FalloutShelter Feb 10 #15
They're not going to stop. We must go nuclear on the press. It's not just The New York Times. FelineOverlord Feb 10 #7
+1. Silence is not an option. dalton99a Feb 10 #9
This is "but her emails" all over again........... no one should be surprised Takket Feb 10 #8
They will be one of the first news organizations multigraincracker Feb 10 #10
No he won't. They will cave in to pushing his narrative JohnSJ Feb 10 #14
+1. Maggie Haberman has been doing it for years. dalton99a Feb 10 #16
Because they weren't invited to Naomi Biden's wedding, they want to destroy democracy. FelineOverlord Feb 10 #13
That was one of the silliest things I've ever seen. shrike3 Feb 10 #18
Ole Droopy Eyed Ashley Parker Prairie Gates Feb 10 #26
I don't give a dime to the NYT. yardwork Feb 10 #17
Hit pieces orangecrush Feb 10 #19
How low can you go, NYT? Paladin Feb 10 #20
I take those two with a grain of salt. The NYT has other columnists who are liberal. I read all opinion columns in the CTyankee Feb 10 #23
You are clearly a better person than I am. (nt) Paladin Feb 10 #42
No, just probably older. Seen too much to be really impressed. But I am very worried about lots of things going on...the CTyankee Feb 10 #43
+1 dalton99a Feb 10 #36
The owners of most of the corporate media are .01% ers who would joyfully embrace fascism if it lowered diane in sf Feb 10 #21
+1. dalton99a Feb 10 #28
They would embrace slavery. John Shaft Feb 10 #39
Good thing most young people don't read the times or watch TV for their information. diane in sf Feb 10 #22
They want to remain a neutral party in the war between democracy and authoritarianism. hay rick Feb 10 #24
Neutrality in the war between... Think. Again. Feb 10 #33
Corporate press is worse than useless, because they're not inert, they're actively inflicting harm. chia Feb 10 #25
Fabulous Warrior Thread, Feline! THANK YOU! ancianita Feb 10 #27
I notice I never see Parker on MSNBC anymore, cilla4progress Feb 10 #29
Hur's Observations Are Beyond The Scope Of His Work DallasNE Feb 10 #30
Exactly why his report... Think. Again. Feb 10 #34
And when Trump was in office "The Lying New York Times" AkFemDem Feb 10 #31
the Times is a rag. I wouldn't wipe my ass with it The Unmitigated Gall Feb 10 #32
You are right and they are wrong senseandsensibility Feb 10 #35
The NYT has ticked me off so badly that I've just done an Act Blue monthly subscription to the Biden campaign. diane in sf Feb 10 #37
The saddest part... GiqueCee Feb 10 #38
Why wouldn't the Republican Owned Media push their agenda and candidate? live love laugh Feb 10 #40
Ugh this is so damn disgusting. Initech Feb 10 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New York Times "full fron...