Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Vasectomy bill proposed in response to Louisiana's abortion ban [View all]
https://www.ktalnews.com/news/louisiana/vasectomy-bill-proposed-in-response-to-louisianas-abortion-ban/BATON ROUGE, La. (KTAL/KMSS) A Louisiana lawmaker is bringing forward a bill this legislative session that she said is tough on crime and protects women amid the states restrictive abortion ban.
HB166 would require convicted sex offenders to undergo a mandatory vasectomy procedure. Representative Delisha Boyd of New Orleans explained why she believes this is an appropriate response to the states new laws.
What it boils down to is that we are unprotected as women in the state of Louisiana. Women are an endangered species in Louisiana. Weve been told about our health care. We cant get equal pay for women. We need a device in place to have some sort of protection, Boyd said, (D) District 102.
Boyd will introduce HB166 in this legislative session. The bill, as proposed, adds penalties to convicted sex offenses by requiring offenders to be subject to a mandatory vasectomy. She said its in response to the states highly restrictive abortion ban that does not allow exceptions for rape and incest.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
92 replies, 6698 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (92)
ReplyReply to this post
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Where in the galloping fuck did I ever intimate that sex offenders should be tolerated?
Act_of_Reparation
Mar 21
#67
Okay, then. They can sue the government for wrongful punishment if they're actually not guilty of rape.
intheflow
Mar 21
#81
Then the few men that caught, tried and convicted as sex offender will have to have vasectomies.
intheflow
Mar 21
#50
Best post of the day. Stop rape and incest, or sterilize sex criminals and allow abortion.
marble falls
Mar 21
#52
A vasectomy doesn't have any impact on one's ability to engage in sexual assault.
brooklynite
Mar 21
#8
While I'm not a fan of this I do like the idea of vasectomies for all over the are of 13.
Hope22
Mar 21
#10
Red states like Louisiana not only want to force birth even when it KILLS the woman, they also..
Hekate
Mar 21
#11
How can they shut down travel to another state for an abortion? How would they know?
CTyankee
Mar 21
#54
Texas passed a snitch law straight away. Then there's a bunch of redneck cops in my own California
Hekate
Mar 21
#70
Demonstrating why your argument was weak was weak argumentation on my part?
Act_of_Reparation
Mar 21
#38
It is in fact a perfect analogy. I'm sorry you have not been paying attention over the past few years.
Hekate
Mar 21
#74
It won't pass, but maybe it will make some men consider what it's like to lose bodily autonomy.
Nevilledog
Mar 21
#5
The bill is only for sexual predators, and while that's a legal designation, there are a lot of men out there who
WhiskeyGrinder
Mar 21
#6
Do they ever connect that with other people losing their autonomy? or is it only for themselves?
WhiskeyGrinder
Mar 21
#14
I've seen both. "Men should be inviolate" vs. "I've done nothing wrong so it doesn't apply"
Nevilledog
Mar 21
#18
My question is, do either of those thoughts get them to "OH! I guess it's wrong if we do it to women, too, and I will
WhiskeyGrinder
Mar 21
#19
Yeah so in the end that's why I'm not a fan of these kinds of bills/sentiments.
WhiskeyGrinder
Mar 21
#21
Some people -- men-people -- have no idea just how angry we are at being tossed back 200 years
Hekate
Mar 21
#15
I just want to say that I am embarrassed by the lack of understanding and empathy shown out here.
Hope22
Mar 21
#62
By that logic, perhaps an amendment is in order. I'm thinking that if a man wants viagra,
PatrickforB
Mar 21
#42
Think long and hard before you decide to employ doctors as agents of the penal state . . .
markpkessinger
Mar 21
#76