Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mike Niendorff

(3,605 posts)
3. * minor corrections
Tue Apr 9, 2024, 10:08 PM
Apr 2024

They are up for "retention" -- which is like re-election, except that it's a "yes/no" question, rather than a "choose your candidate" question. If the voters vote "no", then the governor appoints a replacement.

And yes, both of these justices did indeed vote with the 4-2 majority to put the ban into full effect.

The only dissenters were Justices Timmer and Brutinel.

Thank god I don't live in that state anymore, what a shitshow.


MDN

(* also: the first justice's name is spelled "Bolick" not "Bolock" )

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

TY... Seems they didn't know the temperature of Cha Apr 2024 #1
They must be 200 years old prodigitalson Apr 2024 #2
* minor corrections Mike Niendorff Apr 2024 #3
Well, some of us are still there.... AZ8theist Apr 2024 #7
Still have many friends down there, as well. Mike Niendorff Apr 2024 #8
More hypocrisy from them AZSkiffyGeek Apr 2024 #4
Vote them out of office Trueblue1968 Apr 2024 #5
You should also post this in the Arizona forum ... n/t wackadoo wabbit Apr 2024 #6
Thank you for letting us know. StarryNite Apr 2024 #9
K&R. nt Wednesdays Apr 2024 #10
Buh-bye. pecosbob Apr 2024 #11
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Two of the justices who v...»Reply #3