Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

LetMyPeopleVote

(167,900 posts)
Tue Jun 10, 2025, 08:13 PM Jun 10

The unfortunate reason Hegseth still has an incomplete leadership team at the Pentagon [View all]

The search is on for qualified officials who are both MAGA-friendly and willing to work with an unqualified defense secretary. It’s not going well.

The unfortunate reason Hegseth still has an incomplete leadership team at the Pentagon www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...

Belinda Ballard (@lynieb.bsky.social) 2025-06-10T16:19:14.586Z

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/unfortunate-reason-pete-hegseth-incomplete-leadership-team-pentagon-rcna212037

Donald Trump sat down with The Atlantic in April, and when the discussion turned to his beleaguered defense secretary, the president offered support — in an awkwardly worded way. “I think he’s gonna get it together,” Trump said about Pete Hegseth.

That might yet be true, but the hapless Pentagon chief apparently hasn’t gotten it together just yet. NBC News reported:

The White House is looking for a new chief of staff and several senior advisers to support Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth after a series of missteps that have shaken confidence in his leadership, but it has so far found no suitable takers, according to four current and former administration officials and a Republican congressional aide.


.....While a Pentagon spokesperson denied the accuracy of the reporting, NBC News added: “So far, though, the administration has not had much luck identifying people who are either willing to work for Hegseth or who fit the bill politically.”

It was that sentence that stood out for me because it spoke to the complexity of the challenge: The search is on for qualified officials who are both MAGA-friendly and willing to work with an unqualified and scandal-plagued television personality who was elevated to one of the world’s most difficult administrative positions.

Finding people who check one of the boxes is easy; finding people who check all of the boxes is apparently not going well.

As for why the public should care, The Atlantic’s latest report on DOD developments summarized the landscape nicely: “Hegseth oversees a workforce of more than 3 million, and a budget of close to $1 trillion, without a chief of staff. His shrunken circle of close aides lacks extensive Pentagon experience. Key military commanders are preparing to retire without replacements in sight. Sidelined aides have aired details of unseemly feuds at the department’s senior levels, and a series of unflattering media reports have fueled what numerous officials describe as Hegseth’s fixation on stopping leaks.”

There may come a day when the Pentagon chief, to borrow the president’s phrase, “gets it together,” but that day has not yet arrived
.


2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The unfortunate reason He...