Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

H2O Man

(77,711 posts)

Wed Jun 18, 2025, 03:27 PM

Jun 18

Fascinating case. At first, I assumed she was likely guilty. As the first trial unfolded, it was clear the prosecution could not prove their case beyond a reaonable doubt. The "investigation," headed by a burned out investigator, was corrupt. It seems clear that Ms. Read did not kill him. The sad thing is that we will never know what actually happened.

I assume that the FBI's interest in the case was part of a wider investigation into police corruption.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

****Breaking**** Karen Read : Not Guilty Of Second Degree Murder Charge [View all] DemocratSinceBirth Jun 18 OP

Happy verdict yankee87 Jun 18 #1

Recommended. H2O Man Jun 18 #2

There's a really good documentary odins folly Jun 18 #3

Right. H2O Man Jun 18 #7

You're right, ATF... odins folly Jun 18 #12

The two H2O Man Jun 18 #13

Good, ethical verdict obamanut2012 Jun 18 #4

I, for one, believe she is guilty. Partially because of her smug attitude and fakeness. I do not believe evidence sinkingfeeling Jun 18 #5

I, for two. But am uninformed. UTUSN Jun 18 #10

I would suggest H2O Man Jun 18 #11

good WhiskeyGrinder Jun 18 #6

My wife has been following odins folly Jun 18 #8

I kept on hearing the name but had zero knowledge about what the case was about. Tommy Carcetti Jun 18 #9