Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hakeem Jeffries Statement on Donald Trump's unilateral military action in Iran. [View all]littlemissmartypants
(28,994 posts)33. OT: What's the meaning of the
Strikethrough over "no" and "kings" isn't that creating an ambiguous message?
The striking of words usually means negation at least when editing. So, wouldn't that mean a double negative?
Subsequently, it's reversing the "no kings" opinion, changing the meaning to "no kings" is not ok, and kings are cool.
It's very confusing.
❤️
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Hakeem Jeffries Statement on Donald Trump's unilateral military action in Iran. [View all]
LetMyPeopleVote
Jun 21
OP
"President Trump misled the country about his intentions," to bring peace to the region in the wake of a strike on Iran
LetMyPeopleVote
Jun 21
#7
He doesn't even attend most of his intelligence briefings since he finds them boring, and
Karasu
Jun 21
#15
Call me naive but ... is this another one of those "gentleman's agreement" -type deals?
Alice B.
Jun 21
#18
I would hope he notified the Speaker of the House and the Senate Majority Leader prior to giving the order.
patphil
Jun 21
#19
Woah! For a moment I had a vision of an alternate reality, where this president is a leader, not a dictator.
patphil
Jun 21
#25
Hannity was already making those talking points on his special show tonight.
TexasTowelie
Jun 22
#32