Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(6,078 posts)

8. And that would still not be enough.

Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:16 PM

Jul 2

They need at least 6 more votes if no Republicans end up voting no. And if some do, then they need 10 more votes for a majority.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Looks like four Republican nays Quiet Em Jul 2 #1

ah, Quiet Em Jul 2 #4

And that would still not be enough. Wiz Imp Jul 2 #8

They want to be 'Murkowskied' pfitz59 Jul 2 #2

It's a done deal newdeal2 Jul 2 #5

I wake up to read that all but one caved newdeal2 Jul 3 #16

From C-Span, No votes include ... cliffside Jul 2 #10

That doesn't seem to include Massie Quiet Em Jul 2 #12

Massie No! nt cliffside Jul 2 #15

Five nays now. Quiet Em Jul 2 #13

It's all for show. Kingofalldems Jul 3 #17

It is 219 to 213 dalton99a Jul 3 #18