Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I stopped for gas today and saw these taped to the posts holding up the canape. [View all]MattBaggins
(7,945 posts)69. I don't disagree with that.
I just think people should put a figurative footnote when saying ethanol has less energy.
Now there is much debate to be had about the bullshit tax or "subsidies" we all pay for ethanol, whether we get more bang for our buck or not, and how much food prices are affected, but like solar energy let's not allow Europe to kick our asses with another technology we helped design.
It's really easy for second rate mechanics to claim that a 20 year old car with 150K miles on it or an improperly maintained lawn mower, broke down from E10 fuel. Probably not true but it is easy to say and sounds convincing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I stopped for gas today and saw these taped to the posts holding up the canape. [View all]
RC
Jul 2013
OP
And when Mythbusters took this on, they found that the 10% ethanol, came out ahead on RAW mileage.
TheMadMonk
Jul 2013
#84
The do not sell the non ethanol regular in the Kansas City area. Only the premium variety.
RC
Jul 2013
#10
Not a problem thx for explaining. I would just add the lean bank message is indicating that
Drew Richards
Jul 2013
#25
Bad design. Not bad fuel. Or perhaps just bad luck in component tollerances.
TheMadMonk
Jul 2013
#86
Yep. I've got two vintage autos that are being slowly killed so corn corporations can get a welfare
Egalitarian Thug
Jul 2013
#15
They actually sell gasoline? I thought those were pumps for day-old coffee. n/t
winter is coming
Jul 2013
#21
Democrats have been supporting the use of ethanol ever since the mid-70s!!!
Major Hogwash
Jul 2013
#62
Oil and natural gas companies like ethanol because of the energy needed to make ethanol from growing
RC
Jul 2013
#30
Here in Atlanta it's very hard to escape the Archer Daniels Midland Tax.
kenny blankenship
Jul 2013
#28
Thanks for clarifying my statement - you are correct as it is a 10% mixture.
edgineered
Jul 2013
#41
And if I'd wanted to play silly buggers I could have used the "CANYONERO"...
TheMadMonk
Jul 2013
#118
What it really does is change the pollution produced. Ethanol is not really cleaner.
RC
Jul 2013
#48
The risk associated with ethanol in older engines is the corrosion of rubber and plastic...
Gravitycollapse
Jul 2013
#71
Ethanol corrodes aluminum as well, just not as quickly as old seals and hoses
kenny blankenship
Jul 2013
#80
Higher octane does not mean less energy. It tends to have a higher flash point.
Gravitycollapse
Jul 2013
#66
Did you see the surveillance cameras watching you, violating your 4th Amendment rights?
railsback
Jul 2013
#53
Let's be clear here. A 30% increase in potential energy does not equal a 30% increase in output.
Gravitycollapse
Jul 2013
#74
Applause for rc, who could have edited the OP, but didn't, and provided us with some fun.
Kurovski
Jul 2013
#107
You know those are delicious fried in a little sesame oil and served on a skewer.
bluedigger
Jul 2013
#112