General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I stopped for gas today and saw these taped to the posts holding up the canape. [View all]TheMadMonk
(6,187 posts)A fuel which provides a longer gentler shove maintains constant angular momentum better than one which imparts all of its energy in one hard slam.
And if you look at steam, which applies a CONSTANT push throughout the ENTIRE (assuming double action) piston stroke, the above makes sense, and in fact you can even do better still. A 1930's steam motor can push a 5000+ lb vehicle, with about the same overall fuel efficiency as a infernal combustion engine pushing half that weight. (About 45 MPG. 2.5 tons (give or take) at 45 MPG in a vehicle built in 1936 and still running today, and with its first engine rebuild taking place 50 odd years, and a few million kilometers after assembly: 4 thou wear in the bore, and a heated debate over replacing the piston rings.)
Can you tell me what's wrong with this car? Bingo. NO AFTER MARKET!
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):