Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Heads Up !!! - Propaganda Ban Repealed As Government Made News Floods U.S. - FDL [View all]OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)23. Under the Obama administration,
the Pentagon found no fault in its propaganda campaign leading up to the Iraq war.
Pentagon Finds No Fault in Ties to TV Analysts
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/25/us/pentagon-finds-no-fault-in-its-ties-to-tv-analysts.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all-12-26/news/30559559_1_bachmann-romney-santorum&
In January 2009, the inspector generals office issued a report that said it had found no wrongdoing in the program. But soon after, the inspector generals office retracted the entire report, saying it was so riddled with inaccuracies and flaws that none of its conclusions could be relied upon. In late 2009, the inspector generals office began a new inquiry.
The results of the new inquiry, first reported by The Washington Times, confirm that the Pentagon under Donald H. Rumsfeld made a concerted effort starting in 2002 to reach out to network military analysts to build and sustain public support for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
~snip~
But several former top aides to Mr. Rumsfeld insisted that the purpose of the program was merely to inform and educate, and many of the 63 military analysts interviewed during the inquiry agreed.
Given the conflicting accounts, the inspector generals office scrutinized some 25,000 pages of documents related to the program. But except for one unsigned, undated, draft memorandum, investigators could not find any documents that described the strategy or objective of the program. Investigators said that to understand the programs intent, they had to rely on interviews with Mr. Rumsfelds former public affairs aides, including his spokeswoman, Victoria Clarke. Based on these interviews, the report said, investigators concluded that the outreach activities were intended to serve as an open information exchange with credible third-party subject-matter experts who could explain military issues, actions and strategies to the American public.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/25/us/pentagon-finds-no-fault-in-its-ties-to-tv-analysts.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all-12-26/news/30559559_1_bachmann-romney-santorum&
In January 2009, the inspector generals office issued a report that said it had found no wrongdoing in the program. But soon after, the inspector generals office retracted the entire report, saying it was so riddled with inaccuracies and flaws that none of its conclusions could be relied upon. In late 2009, the inspector generals office began a new inquiry.
The results of the new inquiry, first reported by The Washington Times, confirm that the Pentagon under Donald H. Rumsfeld made a concerted effort starting in 2002 to reach out to network military analysts to build and sustain public support for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
~snip~
But several former top aides to Mr. Rumsfeld insisted that the purpose of the program was merely to inform and educate, and many of the 63 military analysts interviewed during the inquiry agreed.
Given the conflicting accounts, the inspector generals office scrutinized some 25,000 pages of documents related to the program. But except for one unsigned, undated, draft memorandum, investigators could not find any documents that described the strategy or objective of the program. Investigators said that to understand the programs intent, they had to rely on interviews with Mr. Rumsfelds former public affairs aides, including his spokeswoman, Victoria Clarke. Based on these interviews, the report said, investigators concluded that the outreach activities were intended to serve as an open information exchange with credible third-party subject-matter experts who could explain military issues, actions and strategies to the American public.
Behind TV Analysts, Pentagons Hidden Hand
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/us/20generals.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Hidden behind that appearance of objectivity, though, is a Pentagon information apparatus that has used those analysts in a campaign to generate favorable news coverage of the administrations wartime performance, an examination by The New York Times has found.
The effort, which began with the buildup to the Iraq war and continues to this day, has sought to exploit ideological and military allegiances, and also a powerful financial dynamic: Most of the analysts have ties to military contractors vested in the very war policies they are asked to assess on air.
Those business relationships are hardly ever disclosed to the viewers, and sometimes not even to the networks themselves. But collectively, the men on the plane and several dozen other military analysts represent more than 150 military contractors either as lobbyists, senior executives, board members or consultants. The companies include defense heavyweights, but also scores of smaller companies, all part of a vast assemblage of contractors scrambling for hundreds of billions in military business generated by the administrations war on terror. It is a furious competition, one in which inside information and easy access to senior officials are highly prized.
Records and interviews show how the Bush administration has used its control over access and information in an effort to transform the analysts into a kind of media Trojan horse an instrument intended to shape terrorism coverage from inside the major TV and radio networks.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/us/20generals.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Hidden behind that appearance of objectivity, though, is a Pentagon information apparatus that has used those analysts in a campaign to generate favorable news coverage of the administrations wartime performance, an examination by The New York Times has found.
The effort, which began with the buildup to the Iraq war and continues to this day, has sought to exploit ideological and military allegiances, and also a powerful financial dynamic: Most of the analysts have ties to military contractors vested in the very war policies they are asked to assess on air.
Those business relationships are hardly ever disclosed to the viewers, and sometimes not even to the networks themselves. But collectively, the men on the plane and several dozen other military analysts represent more than 150 military contractors either as lobbyists, senior executives, board members or consultants. The companies include defense heavyweights, but also scores of smaller companies, all part of a vast assemblage of contractors scrambling for hundreds of billions in military business generated by the administrations war on terror. It is a furious competition, one in which inside information and easy access to senior officials are highly prized.
Records and interviews show how the Bush administration has used its control over access and information in an effort to transform the analysts into a kind of media Trojan horse an instrument intended to shape terrorism coverage from inside the major TV and radio networks.
Describing the Program
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/04/19/us/20080419_GENERALS_DOCS.html
In memorandums and e-mail messages obtained by The Times, Defense Department officials describe the goals and mission of a program to shape public opinion about the Iraq war through retired military officers who are media analysts.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/04/19/us/20080419_GENERALS_DOCS.html
In memorandums and e-mail messages obtained by The Times, Defense Department officials describe the goals and mission of a program to shape public opinion about the Iraq war through retired military officers who are media analysts.
Speaking of propaganda, where are the fucking blue links to tell us this is just hyperbole?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Heads Up !!! - Propaganda Ban Repealed As Government Made News Floods U.S. - FDL [View all]
WillyT
Jul 2013
OP
All you have to do is look at the Snowden threads, and you'll see attempted manipulation at work. nt
backscatter712
Jul 2013
#6
how? behind your back action from people spouting "transparent", Hope and change nt
msongs
Jul 2013
#8
PS just looked it up. It passed with more than 2/3 so he couldn't veto it, but still it would be
limpyhobbler
Jul 2013
#10
Kick, what the hell is going on in this (we're number 1) country of ours? Sure, let's let the gov.
louslobbs
Jul 2013
#11
But the propaganda will be "kinder and gentler" (no, I do NOT intend to ever let go of it) now.
WinkyDink
Jul 2013
#13
One giant step towards fascism and with a Democratic President even. What the hell do we do in
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#14
Goebbels read Edward Bernays' works before becoming the Nazi PR guy. nt
Democracyinkind
Jul 2013
#50
Thanks. We need to stick together on this. Our point of view is not well understood in some
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#39
Thanks. Sometimes I feel like I'm alone on this issue. I know I'm not, but some threads
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#38
We used to worry that the USSR would take over and do things like this to us.
FiveGoodMen
Jul 2013
#19
That's simply nuts. Utterly inexcusable. Legalized lying, to us, paid for by ... US?
DirkGently
Jul 2013
#21
Ugh, its getting pretty smelly when the US thinks it needs to start progagandizing its citizens
quinnox
Jul 2013
#33
When One Sells Manure For A Living - Propaganda Is The Only Thing That Will Cover The Smell
cantbeserious
Jul 2013
#36