Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
7. You aren't taking into account that the companies can well afford to up the pay
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 07:42 AM
Mar 2014

at least 10 fold. So it is immoral for them not to.

Paying people just barely enough to survive, making them work in appalling conditions where they will get sick and live a short life or go bankrupt trying to pay medical bills is a way to keep people too scared to speak out. When people are fighting for work they take what they can get. If you keep the jobs scarce you can dictate how low the pay will be since people are scrambling for the jobs.

Keeping people in survival mode ensures that they will not stand up to you, that they will not organize as they will be in fear of losing their job.

Sorry, but that sort of thinking is basically saying the worker should be grateful for whatever their overlords deem reasonable. That is immoral. The overlords have multiple mansions, yachts, cars... it is immoral to take that much more money than the people who make you what you are.

I may be rambling a bit, it's almost 4am and I really should go to bed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»“No business which depend...»Reply #7