Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Glitterati

(3,182 posts)

9. Here's why that is incorrect

Reply to Donald Ian Rankin (Reply #6)

Sat Mar 8, 2014, 08:30 AM

Mar 2014

Someone who has no job qualifies for assistance such as food stamps and rent assistance. Minimally, they can put food on the table and a roof over their head.

If you give them a job paying them $4.00/hr they lose ALL assistance. Your lousy job means they can't pay rent or buy groceries. If they are lucky, they MIGHT be able to pay the transportation costs to get to and from that lousy job.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

“No business which depends for existence......... [View all] Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 OP

I believe statements like that are almost considered treason in today's corporately djean111 Mar 2014 #1

Ichingcarpenter Diclotican Mar 2014 #2

K&R ReRe Mar 2014 #3

I don't think that "offering very low wages is evil" makes sense. Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2014 #4

If you need to take care of yourself and your family you are *not* in a position cui bono Mar 2014 #5

I'm afraid the first part of that makes no sense at all. Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2014 #6

You aren't taking into account that the companies can well afford to up the pay cui bono Mar 2014 #7

Here's why that is incorrect Glitterati Mar 2014 #9

Wage Slavery is what you are talking about? Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 #12

Wage slavery is a contradiction in terms. Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2014 #13

The notion of wage slavery, taken reasonably, is actually rather difficult to refute Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 #15

You have never been in the "lower classes" permanently Stargazer99 Mar 2014 #8

What makes you think paying an employee not enough to live is moral? Stargazer99 Mar 2014 #10

What makes you think not employing someone at all is moral? Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2014 #11

That's a false choice. Giving them no job or giving them a shitty job. cui bono Mar 2014 #14

somewhere I read, or heard onethatcares Mar 2014 #16

Dang, I thought it was Campaign Obama Doctor_J Mar 2014 #17