General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: BOOM!!- Jesse Ventura: The LIFE & CRIMES of Dick Cheney [View all]dballance
(5,756 posts)Building 7 has never been explained as a matter of common physics. That's why many architects, physicists and engineers question the conclusion of NIST. NIST, by the way, didn't cite the things you've posted in your videos in their report. Over a decade after the 9/11 tragedy no other building of the same construction has been felled by a similar attack or consequence. No office fires have led to the collapse of a steel-framed building on the scale of what happened on 9/11. Also, the office fires in 7 were pretty typical of office fires.
Call me a conspiracy theorist. That's fine. I am a conspiracy theorist. I truly believe there is more to 9/11 than we publicly know. By the definition of "conspiracy" the fact that many people must have worked together to effect the public knowledge and opinion or hide the truth about an event makes it a conspiracy.
It is quite clear from publically available sources that the Bush administration lied and lied and lied. Yep, they were also arrogant and complacent.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):