General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Attended a salon with Hillary Clinton tonight... [View all]tammywammy
(26,582 posts)I'll break this down for you real easy like:
I don't want people to think I'm possibly racist, because I'm not. So let's pretend David Duke comes out quoted in an article on something I agree with. Let's say David Duke says "Assange is a coward hiding from the Swedish judicial system and blaming the US." I'd agree with that statement. But what I wouldn't do is using that article that quotes a known racist to justify my own position.
And then let's pretend DUer anonymousDUer had started a thread with the same sentiment a year and a half ago, but in August 2013 they were banned by Skinner for "racist". But to back up my David Duke reference I say "some great DUers agree with me" and I link to anonymousDUer's thread.
What would happen, and rightfully so, is I'd get criticizes and "attacked" for using not one, but two racists to back me up. And some people would probably then assume I'm a racist.
So to avoid that, I don't link to racists. And if I did quote a person and honestly didn't realize David Duke is racist, I'd fucking apologize and not dig my heels in.
But you have chosen to not do that. And you expect other DUers to apologize to you, for your actions. What hubris. So people may think you agree with some antisemitic views because of your post about Israel Shamir and then linking to Fire Walk With Me's OP. Then you slyly tried to accuse another active poster of I guess keeping a list of why people are banned, and think you're being attacked when a few posters, within 5 min of your post, point out that it's in the banned poster's profile.
To sum it up: I can only speak for myself, I see no fucking reason to apologize to you.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):