Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
27. I'm tempted to say Pro Vac but I feel like the way they go about it feels kinda wrong.
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 12:44 PM
Feb 2015

Attacking and denigrating people who have a different set of point of view is not the way to bring them to your side.

Even if I would promote vaccination, and think that whatever opposition to vaccination is besides the point, and even if there was an issue, the chances of such an issue actually happening is so remote that the probability of it is almost close to 0, it is better to go about it that way, rather than just attacking them and calling them idiots, all it does is make them go for confirmation bias, and make a bigger deal out of a mole hill.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Du'ers and Vaccines: a poll. [View all] Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 OP
Pro (nt) bigwillq Feb 2015 #1
Pro. Old enough to have had measles and mumps. Arkansas Granny Feb 2015 #2
Pro vaccination Android3.14 Feb 2015 #3
hmmmm.... so you are against immunization requirements? Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #5
Yup. Android3.14 Feb 2015 #7
You realize that vaccination won't work if it's not required? EvolveOrConvolve Feb 2015 #10
Poorly considered argument Android3.14 Feb 2015 #17
No, your argument is poorly considered EvolveOrConvolve Feb 2015 #31
So you're actually anti-vax then. NuclearDem Feb 2015 #14
We've already determined that you are insincere in this debate Android3.14 Feb 2015 #18
"...insincere in this debate" "...Something other than Mein Kampf." NuclearDem Feb 2015 #19
I'm surprised, so far there are zero anti-vac responses. Odd. Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #4
Not odd at all, no one wants to show their username Reter Feb 2015 #12
i don't see any turmoil or widespread dissent. can you link me? ND-Dem Feb 2015 #35
Pro-Vax LostOne4Ever Feb 2015 #6
As I said in an OP a few days ago Kingofalldems Feb 2015 #8
Pro. n/t. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #9
There would be more antis if you didn't add the option to show usernames Reter Feb 2015 #11
it isnt an option Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #13
How many of these are "not anti-vax, BUT..."? NuclearDem Feb 2015 #15
At least one. Iggo Feb 2015 #26
Couldn't vote in your poll. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #16
For you, but I am strongly both things. Most of my adult life I've been hoping for an HIV vaccine Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #24
I think we, in 2015, Dorian Gray Feb 2015 #20
Voted "Pro" ProfessorGAC Feb 2015 #21
Voted "Pro" Had some of those diseases back as a kid. Glad they mostly are FailureToCommunicate Feb 2015 #22
Glad to vote pro-vac. BootinUp Feb 2015 #23
Pro-vax. Very much so. n/t SwissTony Feb 2015 #25
I'm tempted to say Pro Vac but I feel like the way they go about it feels kinda wrong. Xyzse Feb 2015 #27
Were those who insisted the Earth was flat idiots? randome Feb 2015 #28
I agree with this, which is why I am conflicted. Xyzse Feb 2015 #29
For years and years, we've tried it that way EvolveOrConvolve Feb 2015 #32
You may be right, I just don't think this type of attack feels right. Xyzse Feb 2015 #33
Pro Science therefore, Pro Vaxx. nt stevenleser Feb 2015 #30
So it would appear that we're all yelling at one person. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2015 #34
Actually, I voted under different user names 161 times Orrex Feb 2015 #36
The shaming is working. Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #37
Count me in as a tone troll. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2015 #38
Oh I'm sorry, I mistook you for somebody who actually understands what a fucking disaster Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #40
I'm happy for you that you found someone on whom to use the baseball bat. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2015 #43
And here's the split, as you describe: Ilsa Feb 2015 #44
I'd disagree with "they" lumberjack_jeff Feb 2015 #45
I hope this is the end of it. Ilsa Feb 2015 #39
They are idiots. They should be called out for being idiots. Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #41
Are they here on DU? Do we need every fifth thread Ilsa Feb 2015 #42
As a nurse, treating people like idiots shuts down Ilsa Feb 2015 #46
As a human, coddling idiocy encourages more idiocy. nt. Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Du'ers and Vaccines: a po...»Reply #27