Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
14. where?
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:06 PM
Jan 2016

here are some numbers from the 2011 census of wealth

distribution using the medians
9.05% - less than ($8,610) - group A
9.05% - $8,610 to zero - group B
4.55% - zero to $1,679 - group C
4.55% - $1,679 to $4,999 - group D
2.4% - $5,000 to $7,113 - group E
2.4% - $7,113 to $9,999 - group F
3.3% - $10,000 to $16,039 - group G

the total (100%) is 118.7 million households. These seven poorest groups are 35.3% of all households.

Group A, we know has a negative net worth of less than ($93 billion). They are in debt rather than having ANY wealth.

Group D has a net worth of at least $9 billion.

Because of Group A and Group B the total net worth of all those groups combined - is still negative.

As a group they have ZERO net worth, but most of the members, even of group C have more net worth than that.

Group E has a net worth of at least $14 billion (118.7 times 0.024 times $5,000). We also know that they have less than $20 billion (118.7 times 0.024 times $7,113)

So I have total net worth for combined groups of

Group C + Group D + Group E + Group F = $43 billion to $85 billion
Group G = $39 billion to $62 billion

Any person with even a dollar in net worth has more net worth than those 35.3% of households combined, because the combination has less than nothing.

That is part of the way that Oxfam gets their amazing numbers, because people with negative net worth are always going to be in the bottom 50%.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»THE 1% ECONOMY: WORLD'S R...»Reply #14