Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Crunchy Frog

(26,725 posts)
26. Not unless the organs are distributed fairly and equally.
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 09:43 PM
Jan 2017

For that to happen, there would have to be genuine universal health care. Otherwise it's just going to be the rich harvesting the poor.

Kidding Me? busterbrown Jan 2017 #1
YES JI7 Jan 2017 #2
Oh, I don't know. I think that could be challenged in federal court... CTyankee Jan 2017 #3
Religious freedom sarah FAILIN Jan 2017 #28
Ding ding ding!1 - we are about *CHOICE*! n/t UTUSN Jan 2017 #70
Thus the ability to opt out. ManiacJoe Jan 2017 #74
Yes ret5hd Jan 2017 #4
Yes. TexasMommaWithAHat Jan 2017 #5
No Dick Cheney might get it. What bothers me about that is you go into a doc03 Jan 2017 #6
There was a story awhile ago about a guy who NWCorona Jan 2017 #10
I have heard they harvest organs in China that way. You know people with doc03 Jan 2017 #15
Thank goodness that's not how it works here. Texasgal Jan 2017 #16
You just said Steve Jobs effectively bought his, right? doc03 Jan 2017 #17
No. That's not what I said at all. Texasgal Jan 2017 #18
And they have money. So if I need a heart and have the money I can certainly improve my chances doc03 Jan 2017 #25
You still are not getting it. Texasgal Jan 2017 #27
I don't get it? You have money you can increase your chances WTF is that? nt doc03 Jan 2017 #34
Once again.. Texasgal Jan 2017 #36
Doc03 is also failing to negate the benefits of an opt-out program True Dough Jan 2017 #38
I'm not trying to jump into a convo but when you are at a certain level you NWCorona Jan 2017 #49
Actually they are REP Jan 2017 #23
I'm not familiar with this story. Texasgal Jan 2017 #30
Here's a few REP Jan 2017 #45
Thank you Texasgal Jan 2017 #47
Please provide a link to documentation for this. Ms. Toad Jan 2017 #41
It's been a few years and I remembered some of the facts wrong but here you go NWCorona Jan 2017 #48
As I suspected, that is quite a different story. Ms. Toad Jan 2017 #63
That's not how any of that works. LeftyMom Jan 2017 #58
Or I could get your kidney, but hey that's cool if you want to bury it in the ground when you croak NightWatcher Jan 2017 #19
Transplant is a specialty. Transplant surgeons aren't making those decisions because they aren't LeftyMom Jan 2017 #57
I'd go for it, but I think it will be hell to pass here... TreasonousBastard Jan 2017 #7
If you were required to register your religion... scscholar Jan 2017 #31
You want to force people to register their religion? OrwellwasRight Jan 2017 #60
This topic is about saving lives scscholar Jan 2017 #72
Than losing our freedoms, no. OrwellwasRight Jan 2017 #73
What about people who have AIDS? creeksneakers2 Jan 2017 #8
Organs are tested before being placed. Texasgal Jan 2017 #11
In addition to being tested, Ms. Toad Jan 2017 #42
YES!!! Texasgal Jan 2017 #9
Sorry to hear that, Texasgal True Dough Jan 2017 #13
I absolutely agree with that Ron Obvious Jan 2017 #12
oh yes n/t deek Jan 2017 #14
Yes La Lioness Priyanka Jan 2017 #20
Of course. Everyone is entitled to my black, tarry liver. AngryAmish Jan 2017 #21
Don't those countries have national health care? REP Jan 2017 #22
No. LisaL Jan 2017 #24
Not unless the organs are distributed fairly and equally. Crunchy Frog Jan 2017 #26
I agree that single payer would be much better Texasgal Jan 2017 #29
No nt avebury Jan 2017 #32
I would be fine with it, but then I've carried a donor card since about 1972 Hekate Jan 2017 #33
Fine with me. Getting it enacted might be an issue. Here you can designate Hoyt Jan 2017 #35
In thoery, yes. romanic Jan 2017 #37
No. People need to opt in. AgadorSparticus Jan 2017 #39
No. n/t X_Digger Jan 2017 #40
yes Skittles Jan 2017 #43
Of course! tavernier Jan 2017 #44
Opt-out programs almost always have higher rates of participation than opt-in. Igel Jan 2017 #46
Well stated! True Dough Jan 2017 #50
Yes. No brainer (he, he). nt Laffy Kat Jan 2017 #51
I see what you did there! True Dough Jan 2017 #53
Add me to the list of "paranoids" in this thread...I say NO! GReedDiamond Jan 2017 #52
Well then you would just opt out if you were against it. Laffy Kat Jan 2017 #54
I know that, I'm not yet brain dead... GReedDiamond Jan 2017 #56
Nope. 2naSalit Jan 2017 #55
22 Americans a day die waiting for an organ. LeftyMom Jan 2017 #59
Be well, LeftyMom! True Dough Jan 2017 #61
I'm designated as an organ donor....I say no hibbing Jan 2017 #62
Frankly, profit driven America JNelson6563 Jan 2017 #64
No Calculating Jan 2017 #65
Yes. Snackshack Jan 2017 #66
No. nt Raine Jan 2017 #67
Yes, but with heavy emphasis on the "unless". Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2017 #68
Absolutely! True Dough Jan 2017 #71
I'm an organ donor BUT no. I think the opt in should be effortless, but it should be an opt-in. Squinch Jan 2017 #69
No n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2017 #75
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should everyone automatic...»Reply #26