Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(157,858 posts)
Sat Jul 12, 2025, 03:35 AM Jul 12

Judge Cannon reminded a second time that she's been sitting for months on request for Jack Smith's full report [View all]

Source: Law & Crime

Jul 11th, 2025, 3:37 pm


A second nonprofit group attempting to clear the way for the public disclosure of special counsel Jack Smith's full report on the Mar-a-Lago investigation of President Donald Trump's alleged mishandling of classified documents following his first term in office urged U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to rule on its request to intervene and undo an injunction she put in place 171 days ago — an order the DOJ is currently using to its advantage to resist a New York Times lawsuit.

In Cannon's Jan. 21 injunction blocking the release of Smith's Mar-a-Lago report, she pointed out that Trump valet Waltine Nauta and Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos de Oliveira still had an active appeal in the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and that, as a result, they "retain — as all parties agree — due process rights to a fair trial that would be imperiled by public dissemination of Volume II."

"In short, the Department offers no valid justification for the purportedly urgent desire to release to members of Congress case information in an ongoing criminal proceeding," wrote Cannon, the judge who dismissed the president's Espionage Act case and invalidated Smith's appointment as special counsel last July. "Meanwhile, on the other side of the balance, there are two individuals in this action, each with constitutional rights to a fair trial, who remain subject to a live criminal appeal of this Court's Order Dismissing the Superseding Indictment."

At the time of the injunction, the judge noted, the freshly installed Trump administration DOJ had yet to toss the cases against Trump's now former co-defendants.

Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/cannon-reminded-again-its-high-time-to-rule-on-groups-pursuit-of-jack-smith-mar-a-lago-report/



Full headline: Judge Cannon reminded a second time that she's been sitting for months on request for Jack Smith's full Mar-a-Lago report, as DOJ takes full advantage

REFERENCE (first non-profit request) - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143492789
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Post removed Post removed Jul 12 #1
That's an odd way to think of rape. mahatmakanejeeves Jul 12 #2
Okay, maybe I should just have called her a "transactional whore." SalamanderSleeps Jul 12 #3
Cannon is part of the coup. Botany Jul 12 #4
Yep - it was orchestrated from the get-go by Federalist Society and others FakeNoose Jul 12 #6
This Fascist Coup is wide and deep and has been ongoing for years. Botany Jul 13 #20
any normal and ethical congress would have done something about her mdbl Jul 12 #15
Supposedly she was chosen at random from the roster of eligible federal judges to oversee that case. TheRickles Jul 12 #18
It's on her desk kacekwl Jul 12 #5
Until it isn't BoRaGard Jul 12 #7
Her reply, dudes, go pound sand. republianmushroom Jul 12 #8
She's waiting for her appointment to the Supreme court or at least a Federal Appeals Court.. Or , if the angry mob of Marie Marie Jul 12 #9
Stepford Wife ain't remotely qualified for the bench. But we got no mechanisms for recourse? Evolve Dammit Jul 12 #10
If things were reversed BumRushDaShow Jul 12 #12
Repubs have introduced impeachment resolutions against at least a half dozen judges onenote Jul 12 #13
That's because they have had that "BBB" to finish up BumRushDaShow Jul 12 #14
Assuming we have elections. Not so sure. Evolve Dammit Jul 12 #17
If they think they "have it in the bag" BumRushDaShow Jul 12 #19
good point. Evolve Dammit Jul 13 #23
We are still on the precipice though BumRushDaShow Jul 13 #25
It is what it is, as they say and this person is clearly in 45/47 's pocket. Accountability went by the wayside. Evolve Dammit Jul 12 #16
I wonder if Jack Smith has a copy? kimbutgar Jul 12 #11
By now he has probably changed his name and moved out of town FakeNoose Jul 13 #21
I remember asking AG Merrick Garland to release it. Kid Berwyn Jul 13 #22
I think they still wanted to carry the case forward for Walt Nauta and Carlos de Oliveira BumRushDaShow Jul 13 #24
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge Cannon reminded a s...