Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(7,769 posts)
23. That's just silly. A nominee being confirmed with 50 votes vs a nominee being confirmed
Wed Oct 22, 2025, 09:36 AM
20 hrs ago

with 70 votes vs a nominee being confirmed with 90 votes is irrelevant. They are all confirmed and have the exact same amount of power no matter how many votes they got. Rubio was confirmed by unanimous consent. Would he be any better if all Democrats had voted against him? Of course not. He's terrible regardless. Democratic votes did not help the Republicans at all. He was going to be confirmed regardless.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

🤬🤬🤬🤬 Chasstev365 Tuesday #1
lol RandiFan1290 Tuesday #2
I'm curious about that list. ificandream Tuesday #3
Sheldon Whitehouse?! intheflow Tuesday #4
There are several anti trump conservative judges out there mountain grammy Tuesday #10
So far this year, 12 Judicial nominees have been confirmed Wiz Imp 15 hrs ago #36
Might be part of a deal to get the heathcare tax credits covered OP. cstanleytech Tuesday #5
Seems like when dealing with these people we should get our perks Hope22 Tuesday #6
once the judge is sworn in it is for life rampartd Tuesday #8
You can't trust the word of a repuglican mdbl 17 hrs ago #31
Yes you can trust them......to break it if they just feel like it. cstanleytech 15 hrs ago #38
Nope. Democratic votes made no difference in the confirmation. Wiz Imp 15 hrs ago #37
"I have to wonder why Democrats are doing anything to help republicans" Wiz Imp Tuesday #7
I get at least one or two texts a day asking doc03 Tuesday #9
I beg to differ Mysterian 22 hrs ago #17
That's just silly. A nominee being confirmed with 50 votes vs a nominee being confirmed Wiz Imp 20 hrs ago #23
Precisely why I question the Democratic votes Mysterian 20 hrs ago #24
There have been 12 Judicial nominees confirmed so far this year. Wiz Imp 15 hrs ago #35
I agree 100% Ferrets are Cool 20 hrs ago #27
Repubs did need help for cloture, which the dems provided questionseverything 22 hrs ago #18
WRONG. There is no filibuster on nominees. Wiz Imp 21 hrs ago #22
See post # 14 questionseverything 18 hrs ago #29
So what? I repeat: THERE IS NO FILIBUSTER ALLOWED ON NOMINEES. Wiz Imp 16 hrs ago #32
This isn't my job, I don't care either way questionseverything 16 hrs ago #33
{sigh} 🙄🧱🙄🧱 Wiz Imp 16 hrs ago #34
Some "opposition party," eh? (n/t) DJ Synikus Makisimus Yesterday #11
WTAF. 58Sunliner Yesterday #12
Thank Goddess my two are not on that list. With the exception niyad Yesterday #13
I want explanation not exploitation. Don't you? Good grief. What is going on? littlemissmartypants Yesterday #15
Done deal... littlemissmartypants Yesterday #14
Well the Republicans only needed 51 votes Farmer-Rick 22 hrs ago #16
Wrote a few NewEnglandAutumn 21 hrs ago #19
Conservative isn't necessarily equal to Trumper Deminpenn 21 hrs ago #20
Hope you're proud of yourselves, Senate Democrats. Paladin 21 hrs ago #21
I have nothing nice to say. Hotler 20 hrs ago #25
What has happened to Martin Heinrich? Very disappointing. Clouds Passing 20 hrs ago #26
Why would they do this? Emile 19 hrs ago #28
We ask for opposition to fascism Miguelito Loveless 17 hrs ago #30
WTF? karin_sj 11 hrs ago #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»13 Senate Democrats Vote ...»Reply #23