Updated: 80% of world CO2 emissions are related to population levels.

[RobertEarl]

18. Eh?

So you DO believe sunshine is more dangerous than radiation from nukes?

Then you claim:

1) The fires at Fukushima have been controlled for a year and a half (no fires are still burning).

Where is the corium? Last we heard it had burned through the metal and then the concrete. Three buildings are too dangerous for humans and are venting core radiation to the atmosphere. The fires are still burning.

2) There is no such thing as 'F' radiation.

You really didn't even think about this, did you? "F" was just an abbreviation for Fukushima. And it went right over your head? What else goes right over your head? A lot, it appears.

3) There is not statistically-relevant increase in global radiation, at the present time, from either Chernobyl or Fukushima.

There are lies, damn lies and statistics. What's a great lie about your 'statistics' is that these are one-of-a-kind events and the effects of this radiation, besides being hidden by governments, is something that could well continue and cause problems for as you claim -- 80 million years. IOW, the science has not yet determined what the effects will be. Yet here you are making determinations. That is damned foolish, and you know it.

4) There was never a "nuke explosion" (nuclear chain reaction, like in a bomb) at Fukushima.

There are, in nuclear power plants, creating heat, nuclear chain reactions taking place. In a functional reactor the reactions are controlled. When a reactor gets out of control, it blows sky-high. Well, the videos show two reactor buildings blowing sky-high.

And again, you are, before all the science is in, coming to a conclusion that the chain reactions ended as designed. Well, smart people know that until we can examine the core materials, no real conclusions can, nor should, be made. Yet here you are making conclusions!!

In closing all one can determine about your arguments is that you don't know much about what you are claiming. Oh, and about Arnie, he has been proven correct again and again. You, not so much. Now lets see, who should I trust.... Arnie, or some internet poster who can't even figure out what "F" stands for?