You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #35: the argument of believers who are Deists [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
35. the argument of believers who are Deists
Edited on Sun Dec-26-04 09:27 AM by Malva Zebrina
has more logic that this silly proposition-ie I believe in a creator, but one that left us all to our own and took off after the job, washing his hands of the whole thing.

the fault here is that equating intelligence design theory with Darwin's evolution is mixing oranges and apples as many here have pointed out. It should not be allowed to frame the argument by constant comparison to Darwin's theory and that is where the real harm will be done--the absorption of this meme/connection into the consciousness of the true believer.

That is what is behind this push--eliminating anything that poses a dilemma to god beliefs,most especially Christian literalist beliefs, although others more liberal, better read and intelligent, who see the handwriting on the wall,(the bible no longer makes sense given the advances of science) have also jumped onto this sinking boat-- no matter how silly or how many holes in it's propostion.

I think it seems more like desperation , the drowning man swimming to any nearest shore, in order to prevent cognitive dissonance, which is painful and unbearable to the human psyche, and to the pocketbook of clerics. This is dangerous also, as we see this silliness pervading all throughout the country, thanks to Bush astutely recognizing a willing, naive flock to join him in implementing his fascist longings. Historically, the near perfect tool is religion.

We are talking about beliefs that have been firmly entrenched in the consciousness of bewildered humans for thousands of years.

This newly developed one of intelligent designer, in spite of Michael Behe's mouse trap thesis, will be shredded also and after that?

I think we are seeing the last hurrah, before, as Spong has said, the more intelligent will recognize that Christianity Must Change or Die.

I sometimes wonder if those clerics, graduates of well known schools of theology, and knowing,or at the least exposed to the facts and myth behind man's need for religion, yet deliberately lie to the congregation with every sermon preached on many a Sunday, are to be respected. Perhaps they see their role differently than I. :-)











Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC