Reply #83: I'm back [View All]

[sui generis]

it was a stupid post.

"His" objections were not in the face of overwhelming evidence at the time they were written. They were in the face of a bunch of posturing ninnies who didn't have anything but bluster and one liners to snipe with. That's not shrill, unless all defense is shrill.

At any rate, my objections were to the fact that people were shooting their fat lips off with no evidence at all. I am not retracting anything I've said up to this point or editing it, so please feel free to read.

I am perfectly willing to change my opinions in the face OF evidence. Since these posts were written, I have found more articles to study and more research that I will do before I continue to support Peta.

Please put me on ignore - I don't care for your "shrill" observations. In My "Humble" Opinion.