Reply #40: If he was indicted previously, [View All]

[Jackhammer Jesus]

which you kindly pointed out, why exactly did you say he was "innocent until proven guilty?" He's been proven guilty, albeit of only one terrorist act (although he professes to be behind several others), and he's long been on our Most Wanted list, but you would rather leave him to his own devices?

Like I said in my last post, I think it's time for you to provide some facts when it comes to Clark's campaign, because you keep changing the subject. First you claim Clark is talking about Osama because he wants to draw attention away from his "failing" campaign - it would be nice if you backed that up, as I asked you to. And now you're trying to insinuate that going after bin Laden makes him PNAC?

Okay, I'll bite. Your post says that Clark's campaign supports war, bombing civilians, and war crimes. You're saying he's repeating Rove's talking points in his speeches. Not one of these things is even remotely true.

I'd like to see some proof for that argument, but since it "keeps slapping you in the face" that Clark is PNAC, despite your lack of evidence, arguing with you is apparently a lost cause.