You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #31: You're confusing two separate issues. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
wickerwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
31. You're confusing two separate issues.
1.) When we're talking about a woman's right to choose we're talking about an internal physical process that has life-threatening consequences. It's absolutely necessary to give women the final choice about whether or not the embryo will become a baby because the alternative is to either force her to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term (and risk her own life and health in the process) or to seek an unsafe back-alley abortion. Forcing a woman to become a parent when she doesn't want to be one puts her health (and the baby's health) at risk. What's the motivation for a woman in that situation to give up drinking alcohol and smoking? Why should she take care of herself when she's lost control over her own body? The result will be more babies with fetal alcohol syndrome, birth defects, low birth weight, etc. Forcing a man to become a parent when he doesn't want to be one doesn't have the same risks either to his physical health or to the baby's. The only thing at risk is his wallet.

2.) When we're talking about a man's right to choose we're talking about a baby who has already been born. There's no ambiguity here about whether we're talking about a living thing or a clump of cells. And child support is about the child, not about the mother. Why should he or she be punished because of things his or her mother did that were dishonest? It's in the interest of the state that somebody foot the bill for the baby (otherwise the mother and the child will probably be plunged into poverty and it's the state that will be paying). So either the sperm donor or the man who married the woman when the kid was born is going to have to take financial responsibility for the kid.

So to sum up, it's a biological problem. You have to give women the final choice about whether the conception will result in a baby or not because the alternatives are monsterous. So men's choices have to come in at a different time. Either make damn sure that conception doesn't happen in the first place, or take responsibility for the life you half-created.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC